H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Horacio Zeballos vs Michael Berrer H2H: 1-0
Horacio Zeballos holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2009 US Open first round 6-3 7-6(7) 3-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Horacio Zeballos | 6-3 7-6(7) 3-6 6-0 | Michael Berrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio Zeballos | Michael Berrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |