H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Horacio Zeballos vs Paul Capdeville H2H: 0-1
Paul Capdeville holds a 1–0 lead over Horacio Zeballos in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Capdeville leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paul Capdeville won the 2013 Sao Paulo third round 6-7(5) 6-0 3-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 43
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2013* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paul Capdeville | 6-7(5) 6-0 3-0 (ret.) | Horacio Zeballos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Capdeville | #1,186 | #76 | 960 | 1,730 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio Zeballos | Paul Capdeville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #111 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #166 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |