H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Horacio Zeballos vs Peter Polansky H2H: 1-0
Horacio Zeballos holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Polansky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horacio Zeballos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horacio Zeballos won the 2010 Belgrade third round 2-6 6-4 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 41
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 3-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | Peter Polansky | Match data |
| May 6, 2010* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horacio Zeballos | 2-6 6-4 7-6(2) | Peter Polansky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horacio Zeballos | #841 | #39 | 1,027 | 1,876 | 87 | 131 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Peter Polansky | #1,475 | #110 | 495 | 1,676 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horacio Zeballos | Peter Polansky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #821 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #185 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #109 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2012 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #85 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2013 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #56 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2014 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #123 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #119 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2016 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #71 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2018 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #173 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |