H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Horst Skoff vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Horst Skoff holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Horst Skoff leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1995 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horst Skoff
AUT Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 26, 1995* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #52 6-3 7-5 Horst Skoff #50 Match data
May 13, 1992* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Horst Skoff #47 6-4 6-3 Cedric Pioline #57 Match data
Jun 13, 1991* Florence ATP 250 R32 Clay Horst Skoff #24 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Horst Skoff #1,311 #18 1,079 1,875 208 189 52.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horst Skoff Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 1–2 33.3% #299 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1986 12–7 63.2% #42 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 20–20 50.0% #63 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 25–18 58.1% #45 1,793 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1989 35–22 61.4% #25 1,790 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1990 31–22 58.5% #26 1,753 0 3 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1991 34–29 54.0% #33 1,744 0 3 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1992 20–24 45.5% #92 1,666 0 3 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1993 17–18 48.6% #74 1,639 0 4 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1994 11–14 44.0% #47 1,603 0 4 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1995 2–13 13.3% #392 1,527 0 4 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5