H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Horst Skoff vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-1

Horst Skoff holds a 2–1 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Horst Skoff leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 1995 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horst Skoff
AUT Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Cedric Pioline #52 6-3 7-5 Horst Skoff #50 Match data Apr 26, 1995* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Horst Skoff #47 6-4 6-3 Cedric Pioline #57 Match data May 13, 1992* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Horst Skoff #24 6-4 6-2 Cedric Pioline #87 Match data Jun 13, 1991* R32 Florence ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horst Skoff #1,311 #18 1,079 1,868 208 191 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,984 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 1 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horst Skoff Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 1–2 33.3% #299 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1986 12–7 63.2% #42 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 20–20 50.0% #63 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 25–19 56.8% #45 1,776 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1989 35–22 61.4% #25 1,789 0 2 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,482 0 0
21 1990 31–22 58.5% #26 1,754 0 3 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1991 34–29 54.0% #33 1,744 0 3 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1992 20–25 44.4% #92 1,666 0 3 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,849 0 0
24 1993 17–18 48.6% #74 1,657 0 4 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1994 11–14 44.0% #47 1,610 0 4 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,768 0 0
26 1995 2–13 13.3% #392 1,532 0 4 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,761 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,808 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,831 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,765 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,796 0 3
31 — — — — — — — 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,763 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,658 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,619 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Horst Skoff Cedric Pioline
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 4 5 9 44.4% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 6 6 0.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 1990 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1991 5 6 11 45.5% 25 15 40 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1991 6 6 12 50.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1992 1 8 9 11.1% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 13 10 23 56.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5%
24 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 19 9 28 67.9% 11 8 19 57.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 1994 15 11 26 57.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
26 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 8 10 18 44.4% 6 8 14 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 12 7 19 63.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 12 7 19 63.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 13 7 20 65.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 15 13 28 53.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 5 15 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 20 16 36 55.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 16 10 26 61.5% 13 3 16 81.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 4 5 9 44.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 23 44 67 34.3% 163 115 278 58.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 26 47 44.7% — 146 118 264 55.3% 109 93 202 54.0% 46 29 75 61.3% 69 61 130 53.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 155/183 of Horst Skoff's and 560/651 of Cedric Pioline's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Horst Skoff Cedric Pioline
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 1991 54/63 2.5 2.5 60.3% 67.2% 50.6% 54.8% 43.8% 60.0% 41.0% 1991 40/41 3.5 3.4 59.0% 68.7% 51.3% 60.4% 46.4% 61.6% 38.4%
23 1992 35/45 3.2 2.3 58.9% 65.4% 48.2% 54.2% 42.6% 58.1% 39.3% 1992 53/58 5.8 3.7 57.0% 74.5% 46.4% 59.3% 41.4% 62.6% 36.9%
24 1993 30/35 3.1 3.1 54.0% 68.2% 51.0% 57.1% 45.0% 60.1% 42.6% 1993 68/78 5.7 3.0 59.8% 73.8% 52.0% 60.8% 40.6% 65.1% 39.4%
25 1994 22/25 3.1 2.7 54.7% 66.0% 49.0% 51.5% 43.2% 58.4% 37.2% 1994 44/57 4.5 3.3 60.1% 70.1% 48.9% 53.4% 42.1% 61.7% 39.9%
26 1995 14/15 2.2 3.4 55.2% 59.3% 43.4% 58.9% 39.5% 52.6% 34.2% 1995 44/51 4.9 3.8 57.9% 72.7% 48.2% 53.6% 37.8% 62.4% 37.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 53/59 6.0 3.2 55.9% 75.1% 51.7% 62.1% 44.4% 64.9% 39.6%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 51/62 5.9 3.5 60.9% 73.7% 51.1% 61.5% 42.4% 64.7% 38.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 56/64 5.4 3.3 58.6% 73.5% 50.4% 59.3% 47.1% 63.8% 38.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 54/65 6.0 4.6 54.4% 75.4% 49.2% 62.1% 42.4% 63.4% 36.2%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 46/51 8.2 4.8 52.7% 78.8% 51.3% 60.8% 41.8% 65.5% 39.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 31/39 8.3 4.6 52.5% 73.2% 51.4% 63.6% 40.7% 63.1% 36.9%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/26 5.7 4.4 51.2% 71.3% 48.3% 45.7% 32.5% 60.3% 33.6%
Career — 155/399 2.8 2.7 57.5% 66.1% 49.3% 55.0% 43.3% 58.7% 39.8% — 560/671 5.8 3.7 57.1% 73.7% 50.1% 59.3% 42.2% 63.5% 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Horst Skoff Cedric Pioline
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1500 103.6 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 1605 126.2 — — — — -99 +79 — 61.4% +0.36 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1636 132.6 — — — — -111 +62 — 47.3% -0.18 9–3 (75%) 8–5 (62%) 110.8 +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1776 144.9 — — — — -172 -12 — 51.8% +0.22 9–8 (53%) 7–6 (54%) 102.5 -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1789 147.2 — — — — -77 +36 — 56.3% +0.51 10–4 (71%) 7–5 (58%) 105.4 -1.46 1989 1483 114.0 — — — — — +7 — 12.5% -1.88 0–1 — — -0.41
21 1990 1755 146.7 — — — — -30 +96 — 59.8% +0.65 12–14 (46%) 8–10 (44%) 97.1 +0.91 1990 1484 124.4 — — — — +14 +43 — 34.9% -0.47 4–4 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 100.1 +0.10
22 1991 1745 142.6 -0.44 +1.98 1.025 50.5% -64 +97 -227 51.9% +0.28 13–9 (59%) 9–12 (43%) 99.0 -0.59 1991 1665 135.0 +1.05 -0.51 1.002 50.2% -79 -6 — 50.5% +0.06 8–8 (50%) 6–11 (35%) 101.5 -0.32
23 1992 1666 129.9 -2.26 -0.10 0.938 48.6% -94 +113 — 45.7% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +1.10 1992 1849 149.9 +1.29 -1.12 0.985 50.1% -31 -113 -257 52.3% +0.22 10–11 (48%) 10–13 (43%) 101.4 -1.91
24 1993 1658 127.4 -0.67 +2.55 1.068 51.4% -125 +88 — 51.4% +0.04 2–2 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 99.8 +0.24 1993 1937 156.7 +3.18 +1.96 1.128 52.1% +8 -173 -173 60.8% +0.75 16–11 (59%) 19–19 (50%) 100.8 -4.16
25 1994 1610 124.0 -1.71 -1.57 0.894 48.2% -116 +111 — 45.5% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.5 +1.40 1994 1768 141.9 +0.19 +1.74 1.042 50.9% +34 -22 -59 51.3% +0.05 12–15 (44%) 11–8 (58%) 94.5 -0.27
26 1995 1532 117.1 -4.63 -2.24 0.722 44.2% -38 +103 — 12.9% -2.52 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -1.07 1995 1762 147.6 +1.13 +0.42 1.001 49.8% -23 +16 +10 50.8% -0.06 4–9 (31%) 12–7 (63%) 100.1 -3.16
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1809 154.8 +2.69 +2.35 1.129 52.1% -33 +87 +32 63.1% +0.93 8–8 (50%) 10–6 (63%) 101.9 -1.10
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1832 150.4 +2.57 +1.89 1.093 51.3% -28 +52 +117 57.1% +0.51 14–11 (56%) 9–10 (47%) 100.8 -2.00
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1765 148.9 +1.69 +0.86 1.058 51.0% +5 +162 +116 56.6% +0.30 12–10 (55%) 15–14 (52%) 96.7 -0.97
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1797 143.0 +1.68 -0.71 0.989 50.0% -26 -11 +162 55.2% +0.07 9–13 (41%) 25–10 (71%) 101.1 -2.23
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1764 148.1 +2.89 +1.87 1.144 52.4% -10 +168 +138 60.6% +0.75 8–9 (47%) 15–13 (54%) 99.3 +0.89
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1658 131.9 +0.83 -1.42 0.999 50.1% +19 +151 +176 46.7% -0.27 6–8 (43%) 12–9 (57%) 96.8 -0.75
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1620 134.1 -0.60 -1.51 0.847 46.8% +33 +134 +147 35.1% -0.91 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 94.1 -2.76
Career — 1868 143.4 -1.45 +0.74 0.963 49.4% -83 +73 -227 51.1% +0.08 69–52 (57%) 57–56 (50%) 103.6 +0.20 — 1984 152.3 +1.77 +0.70 1.047 50.8% -10 +32 +46 54.2% +0.27 114–123 (48%) 149–132 (53%) 98.5 -2.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.