H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Horst Skoff vs Horacio de la Pena H2H: 3-1
Horst Skoff holds a 3–1 lead over Horacio de la Pena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Horst Skoff leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Horst Skoff won the 1992 Umag third round 4-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 59
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 1992* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horst Skoff | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1991* | Geneva | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Horst Skoff | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1991* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Horst Skoff | 6-0 6-3 | Horacio de la Pena | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1991* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Horacio de la Pena | 6-1 6-1 | Horst Skoff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horst Skoff | #1,311 | #18 | 1,079 | 1,875 | 208 | 189 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Horacio de la Pena | #846 | #31 | 679 | 1,832 | 185 | 173 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horst Skoff | Horacio de la Pena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #42 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #70 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #45 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #38 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #88 | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #52 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #128 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 20–14 | 58.8% | #63 | 1,724 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #74 | 1,639 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #101 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #47 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #114 | 1,552 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #392 | 1,527 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #79 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #265 | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |