H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Horst Skoff vs Jim Grabb H2H: 1-0

Horst Skoff holds a 1–0 lead over Jim Grabb in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horst Skoff leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Horst Skoff won the 1993 Jakarta round of 32 6-4 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Horst Skoff
AUT Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jim Grabb
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horst Skoff #96 6-4 7-6(2) Jim Grabb #53 Match data Jan 14, 1993* R32 Jakarta ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horst Skoff #1,311 #18 1,079 1,868 208 191 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jim Grabb #927 #24 760 1,828 179 199 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Horst Skoff Jim Grabb
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1985 1–2 33.3% #299 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1986 12–7 63.2% #42 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1987 20–20 50.0% #63 1,635 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1988 25–19 56.8% #45 1,776 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 1989 35–22 61.4% #25 1,789 0 2 — — — — — — —
21 1990 31–22 58.5% #26 1,754 0 3 1985 4–4 50.0% #251 1,560 0 0
22 1991 34–29 54.0% #33 1,744 0 3 1986 7–6 53.8% #94 1,636 0 0
23 1992 20–25 44.4% #92 1,666 0 3 1987 20–18 52.6% #66 1,687 0 1
24 1993 17–18 48.6% #74 1,657 0 4 1988 17–23 42.5% #91 1,562 0 1
25 1994 11–14 44.0% #47 1,610 0 4 1989 27–20 57.4% #35 1,767 0 1
26 1995 2–13 13.3% #392 1,532 0 4 1990 16–18 47.1% #72 1,688 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 1991 19–23 45.2% #87 1,680 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 1992 31–24 56.4% #55 1,748 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1993 6–9 40.0% #197 1,690 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1994 18–20 47.4% #68 1,670 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1995 6–17 26.1% #207 1,545 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1996 6–10 37.5% #199 1,564 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1997 2–7 22.2% #342 1,516 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Horst Skoff Jim Grabb
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 4 5 9 44.4% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 0 6 6 0.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 7 5 12 58.3% 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 20 14 34 58.8% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 1985 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1991 5 6 11 45.5% 25 15 40 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1992 1 8 9 11.1% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 14 9 23 60.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
24 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1995 1 5 6 16.7% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 10 7 17 58.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 13 26 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 16 15 31 51.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 5 17 70.6%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 12 26 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 14 19 26.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 23 44 67 34.3% 163 115 278 58.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 26 47 44.7% — 126 125 251 50.2% 3 13 16 18.8% 10 20 30 33.3% 40 41 81 49.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Horst Skoff Jim Grabb
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1985 1500 103.6 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.87 1–1 — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 1605 126.2 — — — — -99 +79 — 61.4% +0.36 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1987 1636 132.6 — — — — -111 +62 — 47.3% -0.18 9–3 (75%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1988 1776 144.9 — — — — -172 -12 — 51.8% +0.22 9–8 (53%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 1789 147.2 — — — — -77 +36 — 56.3% +0.51 10–4 (71%) 7–5 (58%) — -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1755 146.7 — — — — -30 +96 — 59.8% +0.65 12–14 (46%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.91 1985 1560 123.7 — — — — +46 — — 47.6% -0.24 1–1 0–2 — +0.16
22 1991 1745 142.6 -0.44 +1.98 1.025 50.5% -64 +97 -227 51.9% +0.28 13–9 (59%) 9–12 (43%) — -0.59 1986 1636 129.6 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.40 3–1 (75%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.05
23 1992 1666 129.9 -2.26 -0.10 0.938 48.6% -94 +113 — 45.7% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.10 1987 1688 137.5 — — — — +49 — — 48.8% +0.04 4–2 (67%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.31
24 1993 1658 127.4 -0.67 +2.55 1.068 51.4% -125 +88 — 51.4% +0.04 2–2 (50%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.24 1988 1562 123.6 — — — — +13 -58 -17 45.0% -0.28 6–6 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.31
25 1994 1610 124.0 -1.71 -1.57 0.894 48.2% -116 +111 — 45.5% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.40 1989 1768 139.4 — — — — +19 — — 56.7% +0.35 6–9 (40%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.18
26 1995 1532 117.1 -4.63 -2.24 0.722 44.2% -38 +103 — 12.9% -2.52 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -1.07 1990 1689 132.1 — — — — +29 -250 -88 48.2% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.10
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1681 136.8 +1.98 -1.92 1.009 50.2% +35 — -107 51.3% +0.05 7–17 (29%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.72
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1749 141.9 +3.85 -1.34 1.048 50.4% +32 -275 -178 52.2% +0.19 11–7 (61%) 11–11 (50%) — +1.42
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1691 122.3 -0.49 -1.37 0.878 47.6% +9 — — 45.9% -0.22 2–3 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.36
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1670 136.2 +0.52 -2.08 0.937 48.9% +50 — -139 50.0% +0.04 7–8 (47%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1546 127.6 -0.66 -2.43 0.847 47.4% +34 — — 33.3% -1.11 2–5 (29%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.25
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1565 120.0 +0.58 -1.86 0.923 48.7% +2 — — 41.9% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — +0.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1516 104.9 -2.13 -1.64 0.777 45.3% +9 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.17
Career — 1868 143.4 -1.45 +0.74 0.963 49.4% -83 +73 -227 51.1% +0.08 69–52 (57%) 57–56 (50%) 103.6 +0.20 — 1829 140.2 +1.52 -1.78 0.959 49.2% +30 -207 -101 48.5% -0.08 58–69 (46%) 75–85 (47%) 96.6 +0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.