H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Horst Skoff vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 2-1
Horst Skoff holds a 2–1 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Horst Skoff leads 2–0 on clay, while Luiz Mattar leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Horst Skoff won the 1992 Genova fourth round 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1992* | Genova | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Horst Skoff | 7-6(5) 7-5 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| May 15, 1991* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Horst Skoff | 6-1 6-1 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1990* | Berlin | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Luiz Mattar | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Horst Skoff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horst Skoff | #1,311 | #18 | 1,079 | 1,875 | 208 | 189 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horst Skoff | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #42 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #45 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1991 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #74 | 1,639 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #47 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #392 | 1,527 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |