H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Horst Skoff vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 1-0

Horst Skoff holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Damm Sr in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Horst Skoff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Horst Skoff won the 1992 Genova round of 32 6-4 7-5.

AUT Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Horst Skoff #58 6-4 7-5 Martin Damm Sr Match data Jun 18, 1992* R32 Genova ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Horst Skoff #1,311 #18 1,079 1,868 208 191 52.1% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Martin Damm Sr 1,731 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Horst Skoff Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1985 1–2 33.3% #299 1,499 0 0
1986 12–7 63.2% #42 1,604 0 0
1987 20–20 50.0% #63 1,635 0 0
1988 25–19 56.8% #45 1,776 0 2
1989 35–22 61.4% #25 1,789 0 2
1990 31–22 58.5% #26 1,754 0 3
1991 34–29 54.0% #33 1,744 0 3
1992 20–25 44.4% #92 1,666 0 3
1993 17–18 48.6% #74 1,657 0 4
1994 11–14 44.0% #47 1,610 0 4
1995 2–13 13.3% #392 1,532 0 4

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Horst Skoff Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1985 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
1986 1 3 4 25.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1987 4 5 9 44.4% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 2 1 3 66.7%
1988 0 6 6 0.0% 20 12 32 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 0 5 100.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1989 7 5 12 58.3% 25 13 38 65.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
1990 3 2 5 60.0% 20 14 34 58.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
1991 5 6 11 45.5% 25 15 40 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
1992 1 8 9 11.1% 17 14 31 54.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
1993 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
1994 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
1995 1 5 6 16.7% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
2002 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 23 44 67 34.3% 163 115 278 58.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 21 26 47 44.7% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Horst Skoff Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1985 1500 103.6 37.5% -0.87 1–1 +0.07 1989 1492 98.3 0.0% -5.00 -0.08
1986 1605 126.2 -99 +79 61.4% +0.36 2–3 (40%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 +1.31 1990 1478 98.3 0.0% -2.50 +0.15
1987 1636 132.6 -111 +62 47.3% -0.18 9–3 (75%) 8–5 (62%) 110.8 +0.29 1991 1504 104.7 +57 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 +0.21
1988 1776 144.9 -172 -12 51.8% +0.22 9–8 (53%) 7–6 (54%) 102.5 -1.42 1992 1546 125.4 +65 -88 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
1989 1789 147.2 -77 +36 56.3% +0.51 10–4 (71%) 7–5 (58%) 105.4 -1.46 1993 1647 128.4 +28 -196 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
1990 1755 146.7 -30 +96 59.8% +0.65 12–14 (46%) 8–10 (44%) 97.1 +0.91 1994 1630 133.5 -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
1991 1745 142.6 -0.44 +1.98 1.025 50.5% -64 +97 -227 51.9% +0.28 13–9 (59%) 9–12 (43%) 99.0 -0.59 1995 1619 133.0 +8 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
1992 1666 129.9 -2.26 -0.10 0.938 48.6% -94 +113 45.7% -0.46 5–4 (56%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +1.10 1996 1709 139.5 +35 -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
1993 1658 127.4 -0.67 +2.55 1.068 51.4% -125 +88 51.4% +0.04 2–2 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 99.8 +0.24 1997 1694 135.4 +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
1994 1610 124.0 -1.71 -1.57 0.894 48.2% -116 +111 45.5% -0.29 6–3 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.5 +1.40 1998 1649 132.2 +16 +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
1995 1532 117.1 -4.63 -2.24 0.722 44.2% -38 +103 12.9% -2.52 0–1 0–3 (0%) -1.07 1999 1578 123.5 +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
2000 1615 127.5 -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
2001 1514 96.3 +91 15.0% -1.90 0–2 +0.77
2002 1525 111.4 +15 37.5% -0.75 1–1 -0.13
Career 1868 143.4 -1.45 +0.74 0.963 49.4% -83 +73 -227 51.1% +0.08 69–52 (57%) 57–56 (50%) 103.6 +0.20 Career 1732 136.6 +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.