H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Horst Skoff vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 2-2
Horst Skoff and Tomas Carbonell are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Horst Skoff leads 2–1 on clay, while Tomas Carbonell leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tomas Carbonell won the 1991 Miami Masters third round 0-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1991* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tomas Carbonell | 0-6 6-1 6-2 | Horst Skoff | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1990* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Horst Skoff | 6-2 6-0 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1989* | Hilversum | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Tomas Carbonell | 7-5 6-3 | Horst Skoff | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1988* | Athens | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Horst Skoff | 6-2 6-2 | Tomas Carbonell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horst Skoff | #1,311 | #18 | 1,079 | 1,875 | 208 | 189 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tomas Carbonell | #860 | #40 | 900 | 1,776 | 193 | 222 | 46.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horst Skoff | Tomas Carbonell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #42 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #404 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #242 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #45 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #209 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #76 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 14–26 | 35.0% | #96 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #65 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #74 | 1,639 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #89 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #47 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #62 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #392 | 1,527 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #75 | 1,585 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #170 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #826 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |