H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Horst Skoff vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-1
Horst Skoff and Tomas Smid are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Horst Skoff won the 1989 Madrid fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1989* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Horst Skoff | 6-4 6-1 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
| Jul 17, 1987* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Smid | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Horst Skoff | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Horst Skoff | #1,311 | #18 | 1,079 | 1,875 | 208 | 189 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Horst Skoff | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1986 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #42 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #45 | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #33 | 1,744 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #92 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #74 | 1,639 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1994 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #47 | 1,603 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1995 | 2–13 | 13.3% | #392 | 1,527 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |