H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hubert Hurkacz vs Marco Cecchinato H2H: 2-0
Hubert Hurkacz holds a 2–0 lead over Marco Cecchinato in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hubert Hurkacz leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hubert Hurkacz won the 2022 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Italy
Age 33
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2022* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Hubert Hurkacz | 6-1 6-4 6-2 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2019* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Hubert Hurkacz | 6-4 6-4 | Marco Cecchinato | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubert Hurkacz | #68 | #6 | 4,235 | 2,053 | 215 | 147 | 59.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Marco Cecchinato | #175 | #16 | 2,091 | 1,903 | 79 | 128 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hubert Hurkacz | Marco Cecchinato | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #163 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #86 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #187 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #9 | 1,949 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #109 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #20 | 1,771 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2023 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2019 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #80 | 1,764 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2025 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #72 | 1,913 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #100 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #68 | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #101 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #198 | 1,613 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |