H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hubert Hurkacz vs Thomas Fabbiano H2H: 1-0
Hubert Hurkacz holds a 1–0 lead over Thomas Fabbiano in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hubert Hurkacz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hubert Hurkacz won the 2021 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Poland
Age 29
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 37
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2021* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Hubert Hurkacz | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Thomas Fabbiano | Match data |
| Aug 7, 2017 | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Thomas Fabbiano | 7-5 3-6 6-4 | Hubert Hurkacz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hubert Hurkacz | #68 | #6 | 4,235 | 2,053 | 215 | 147 | 59.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Thomas Fabbiano | #1,768 | #70 | 715 | 1,748 | 27 | 62 | 30.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hubert Hurkacz | Thomas Fabbiano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #371 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #86 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2020 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #34 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2021 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #9 | 1,949 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #10 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2023 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2024 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #16 | 1,941 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2025 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #72 | 1,913 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #73 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2026 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #68 | 1,841 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #114 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #172 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #317 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |