H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Hugo Dellien vs Aljaz Bedene H2H: 0-1
Aljaz Bedene holds a 1–0 lead over Hugo Dellien in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Aljaz Bedene leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Aljaz Bedene won the 2019 Rio de Janeiro quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Bolivia
Age 33
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2021* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Clay | Hugo Dellien | 6-2 6-1 | Aljaz Bedene | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2019* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Aljaz Bedene | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Hugo Dellien | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hugo Dellien | #144 | #64 | 775 | 1,757 | 26 | 63 | 29.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aljaz Bedene | #1,030 | #43 | 1,169 | 1,893 | 130 | 159 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hugo Dellien | Aljaz Bedene | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #95 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #145 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2019 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2020 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #111 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #49 | 1,816 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #115 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #132 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,838 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2023 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #112 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2024 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #124 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #109 | 1,773 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2025 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #140 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #347 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2026 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #144 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |