H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Hugo Gaston vs Roberto Carballes Baena H2H: 2-1
Hugo Gaston holds a 2–1 lead over Roberto Carballes Baena in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Hugo Gaston leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Carballes Baena won the 2025 Cincinnati Open first round 6-4 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
France
Age 25
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 33
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2025* | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Roberto Carballes Baena | 6-4 5-7 6-3 | Hugo Gaston | Match data |
| Jul 25, 2024* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Hugo Gaston | 6-2 7-6(5) | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
| Jan 16, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hugo Gaston | 6-3 6-2 3-6 6-4 | Roberto Carballes Baena | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hugo Gaston | #107 | #58 | 923 | 1,764 | 48 | 78 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roberto Carballes Baena | #165 | #49 | 1,071 | 1,798 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hugo Gaston | Roberto Carballes Baena | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1244 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #162 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #67 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #267 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #108 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #167 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #104 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #131 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #76 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #106 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #107 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #73 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #80 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #97 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #79 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #74 | 1,727 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #57 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #129 | 1,655 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |