H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Hyeon Chung vs Albert Ramos-Vinolas H2H: 1-1
Hyeon Chung and Albert Ramos-Vinolas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hyeon Chung leads 1–0 on grass, while Albert Ramos-Vinolas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Albert Ramos-Vinolas won the 2016 Indian Wells Masters first round 2-6 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2016* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | 2-6 6-0 6-3 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2015* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Hyeon Chung | 6-4 7-6(6) | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Albert Ramos-Vinolas | #477 | #17 | 2,180 | 1,966 | 276 | 327 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyeon Chung | Albert Ramos-Vinolas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #66 | 1,722 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–30 | 46.4% | #50 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #63 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #54 | 1,768 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #27 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 33–30 | 52.4% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #46 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #45 | 1,730 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #39 | 1,741 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #89 | 1,660 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #165 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,570 | 0 | 4 |