H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hyeon Chung vs Kyle Edmund H2H: 0-2
Kyle Edmund holds a 2–0 lead over Hyeon Chung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kyle Edmund leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kyle Edmund won the 2018 Brisbane fourth round 7-6(3) 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
Great Britain
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2018* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 7-6(3) 5-7 6-4 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
| Aug 2, 2017* | Washington | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Kyle Edmund | 6-3 6-1 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kyle Edmund | #703 | #14 | 2,330 | 2,002 | 113 | 120 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyeon Chung | Kyle Edmund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,891 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #50 | 1,877 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,958 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #69 | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #48 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #581 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #538 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |