H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Hyeon Chung vs Rafael Nadal H2H: 0-3
Rafael Nadal holds a 3–0 lead over Hyeon Chung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rafael Nadal leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rafael Nadal won the 2019 US Open third round 6-3 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 40
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2019* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 6-3 6-4 6-2 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
| Nov 2, 2017* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Rafael Nadal | 7-5 6-3 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
| Apr 29, 2017* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Rafael Nadal | 7-6(1) 6-2 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rafael Nadal | #175 | #1 | 15,390 | 2,500 | 1,045 | 225 | 82.3% | 22 | 36 | 0 | 18 | 15 | 91 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyeon Chung | Rafael Nadal | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #49 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #51 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 77–10 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,155 | 1 | 12 |
| 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 58–12 | 82.9% | #2 | 2,129 | 2 | 17 |
| 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 71–15 | 82.6% | #2 | 2,154 | 3 | 23 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 73–11 | 86.9% | #1 | 2,254 | 5 | 30 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 64–14 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,176 | 6 | 35 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 71–10 | 87.7% | #1 | 2,292 | 9 | 42 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 64–15 | 81.0% | #2 | 2,260 | 10 | 45 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 42–7 | 85.7% | #4 | 2,333 | 11 | 49 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 75–7 | 91.5% | #1 | 2,437 | 13 | 59 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 49–11 | 81.7% | #3 | 2,270 | 14 | 63 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 60–20 | 75.0% | #5 | 2,231 | 14 | 66 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 36–13 | 73.5% | #9 | 2,123 | 14 | 68 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 67–12 | 84.8% | #1 | 2,277 | 16 | 74 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 43–4 | 91.5% | #2 | 2,339 | 17 | 79 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 54–9 | 85.7% | #1 | 2,345 | 19 | 83 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 23–5 | 82.1% | #2 | 2,299 | 20 | 85 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 24–5 | 82.8% | #6 | 2,269 | 20 | 87 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 40–9 | 81.6% | #2 | 2,194 | 22 | 91 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #670 | 2,155 | 22 | 91 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #153 | 2,046 | 22 | 91 |