H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Hyeon Chung vs Tomas Berdych H2H: 1-2
Tomas Berdych holds a 2–1 lead over Hyeon Chung in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Tomas Berdych leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hyeon Chung won the 2018 Indian Wells Masters third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
South Korea
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 40
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Hyeon Chung | 6-4 6-4 | Tomas Berdych | Match data |
| May 26, 2017* | Lyon | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 7-5 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2015* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tomas Berdych | 6-3 6-4 | Hyeon Chung | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyeon Chung | #493 | #19 | 1,897 | 2,022 | 71 | 67 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Berdych | #104 | #4 | 5,230 | 2,232 | 594 | 321 | 64.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyeon Chung | Tomas Berdych | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #550 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #113 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #45 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #104 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #24 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 2017 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,933 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #25 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,913 | 0 | 3 |
| 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #128 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #20 | 1,919 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,885 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #6 | 1,919 | 0 | 5 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #7 | 2,080 | 0 | 6 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 52–20 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,157 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 51–24 | 68.0% | #7 | 2,084 | 0 | 8 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #7 | 2,082 | 0 | 10 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 57–22 | 72.2% | #6 | 2,109 | 0 | 12 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #10 | 2,080 | 0 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #19 | 2,027 | 0 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #71 | 1,909 | 0 | 13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #104 | 1,869 | 0 | 13 |