H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hyung-Taik Lee vs Flavio Saretta H2H: 1-0
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Flavio Saretta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2006 Wimbledon first round 7-6(10) 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 46
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Hyung-Taik Lee | 7-6(10) 6-3 7-5 | Flavio Saretta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Flavio Saretta | #950 | #44 | 839 | 1,792 | 68 | 74 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyung-Taik Lee | Flavio Saretta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #98 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #45 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #111 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #109 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #118 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #188 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |