H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Hyung-Taik Lee vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0

Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2003 Memphis round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Justin Gimelstob
USA Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hyung-Taik Lee #62 6-3 6-4 Justin Gimelstob #86 Match data Feb 20, 2003* R32 Memphis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hyung-Taik Lee — #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Justin Gimelstob — #63 733 1,722 107 171 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Justin Gimelstob
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% — 1,529 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0 1996 3–9 25.0% #152 1,510 0 0
20 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0 1997 17–23 42.5% #104 1,630 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1998 14–15 48.3% #80 1,661 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1999 17–26 39.5% #82 1,645 0 0
23 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0 2000 14–16 46.7% #97 1,675 0 0
24 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0 2001 3–12 20.0% #177 1,595 0 0
25 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0 2002 5–6 45.5% #106 1,619 0 0
26 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0 2003 9–17 34.6% #106 1,532 0 0
27 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1 2004 1–5 16.7% #162 1,507 0 0
28 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1 2005 8–9 47.1% #104 1,595 0 0
29 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1 2006 14–20 41.2% #86 1,606 0 0
30 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1 2007 1–12 7.7% #556 1,537 0 0
31 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Justin Gimelstob
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 16 31 48.4% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 7 12 41.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 13 16 29 44.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 10 9 19 52.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
24 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 2 10 12 16.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 2005 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 6 13 19 31.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
30 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — 71 112 183 38.8% 8 17 25 32.0% 24 35 59 40.7% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's and 259/278 of Justin Gimelstob's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Justin Gimelstob
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 2/2 8.0 5.0 62.7% 69.5% 44.6% 68.1% 31.7% 59.4% 30.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 10/12 5.1 3.4 54.9% 73.3% 46.5% 41.8% 50.8% 61.4% 35.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 36/40 6.0 5.8 58.7% 71.8% 44.8% 51.3% 37.8% 60.5% 35.9%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 26/29 5.5 3.9 59.7% 72.6% 47.9% 55.6% 44.3% 62.5% 39.5%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 37/43 6.9 3.9 60.4% 72.2% 47.6% 56.4% 39.5% 62.4% 35.7%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 29/30 8.3 4.4 58.7% 73.7% 49.6% 57.8% 36.8% 63.2% 37.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 13/15 5.6 5.7 55.5% 71.2% 45.9% 45.8% 36.3% 59.8% 34.1%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 10/11 5.5 5.7 53.9% 69.8% 43.4% 49.0% 29.6% 57.9% 37.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 26/26 7.3 4.2 54.5% 73.8% 45.2% 63.5% 42.7% 60.7% 36.5%
27 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2% 2004 6/6 4.5 5.5 48.7% 73.2% 49.4% 40.7% 26.3% 60.7% 35.9%
28 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2% 2005 17/17 11.4 4.9 56.8% 77.1% 52.2% 59.4% 40.1% 66.2% 35.8%
29 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9% 2006 34/34 7.0 2.9 56.6% 72.4% 47.8% 63.7% 36.2% 61.7% 34.9%
30 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4% 2007 13/13 4.3 4.8 57.1% 65.3% 43.1% 49.5% 26.4% 55.8% 29.5%
31 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.5% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9% — 259/278 6.8 4.4 57.4% 72.4% 47.1% 55.5% 38.3% 61.5% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Justin Gimelstob
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1530 110.0 -1.36 +1.92 0.750 45.8% — — — 37.5% -0.63 1–0 — — -0.13
19 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15 1996 1510 118.9 +0.13 +0.36 0.915 48.2% +28 — — 29.6% -0.93 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.63
20 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10 1997 1630 134.5 -1.35 -0.78 0.909 48.5% +30 — -55 43.3% -0.47 7–6 (54%) 10–8 (56%) 103.8 +0.60
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1661 129.0 +0.39 +1.22 1.052 50.8% -10 -75 -71 50.7% +0.12 6–8 (43%) 4–9 (31%) 96.0 -0.12
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1645 137.7 -0.21 -1.19 0.949 49.1% +36 -75 -122 45.0% -0.28 3–10 (23%) 7–12 (37%) 91.8 -1.22
23 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19 2000 1675 126.8 +0.05 +0.25 1.022 50.4% +34 -174 -115 47.5% -0.40 5–7 (42%) 10–6 (63%) 99.6 +0.17
24 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44 2001 1596 108.5 -1.35 -2.71 0.849 47.0% +17 — -76 29.3% -1.39 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.32
25 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.31 2002 1620 119.3 -1.95 +1.16 0.880 46.9% +9 — -59 40.7% -0.81 2–0 1–2 (33%) — -0.03
26 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.15 2003 1532 117.2 -2.07 -0.87 0.929 48.9% +13 — +76 40.0% -0.51 3–5 (38%) 3–7 (30%) 95.7 +1.70
27 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.9 -1.24 2004 1507 110.1 -0.55 -0.52 0.913 47.3% +4 — — 23.1% -1.69 0–3 (0%) — — -0.42
28 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 -0.09 2005 1596 127.5 +2.04 +0.31 1.059 51.1% -56 — +71 48.9% +0.08 2–5 (29%) 6–7 (46%) 99.7 -0.05
29 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.85 2006 1606 122.4 -0.69 -1.72 0.913 49.0% -77 -132 +106 44.9% -0.32 3–5 (38%) 6–7 (46%) 100.7 +0.54
30 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 110.0 -0.52 2007 1537 116.4 -4.94 -3.75 0.668 43.5% -37 — +128 10.0% -2.37 0–1 0–2 — -0.45
31 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) 97.7 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80 — 1722 132.5 -0.75 -0.68 0.933 48.8% +5 -103 -6 41.7% -0.51 35–56 (38%) 51–68 (43%) 92.8 +0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.