H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hyung-Taik Lee vs Justin Gimelstob H2H: 1-0
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Justin Gimelstob in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2003 Memphis third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-3 6-4 | Justin Gimelstob | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Justin Gimelstob | #841 | #63 | 733 | 1,721 | 107 | 171 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyung-Taik Lee | Justin Gimelstob | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #576 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #104 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #82 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #97 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #106 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #106 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #162 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #104 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #556 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |