H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Hyung-Taik Lee vs Kristian Pless H2H: 1-1

Hyung-Taik Lee and Kristian Pless are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2006 Japan Open round of 32 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Kristian Pless
DEN Age 45 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hyung-Taik Lee #57 7-5 6-1 Kristian Pless #109 Match data Oct 5, 2006* R32 Japan Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Kristian Pless #74 6-2 6-2 Hyung-Taik Lee #95 Match data Feb 28, 2002* R32 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kristian Pless #939 #65 592 1,712 44 82 34.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Kristian Pless
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1999 1–2 33.3% #458 1,511 0 0
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0 2000 1–4 20.0% #197 1,507 0 0
20 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0 2001 12–10 54.5% #68 1,662 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2002 15–22 40.5% #82 1,664 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2003 2–5 28.6% #440 1,611 0 0
23 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0 2004 3–9 25.0% #230 1,553 0 0
24 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #160 1,543 0 0
25 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0 2006 5–10 33.3% #84 1,626 0 0
26 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0 2007 5–16 23.8% #128 1,509 0 0
27 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1 2008 0–2 0.0% #158 1,480 0 0
28 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Kristian Pless
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 8 10 18 44.4% 3 8 11 27.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2007 3 9 12 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — 29 47 76 38.2% 7 16 23 30.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's and 115/126 of Kristian Pless's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Kristian Pless
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 2/3 3.5 2.5 55.5% 69.0% 58.7% 50.0% 39.6% 64.4% 38.5%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/5 2.5 1.5 60.9% 70.2% 51.6% 56.4% 35.0% 62.6% 25.7%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 21/22 5.0 3.1 60.1% 70.8% 50.9% 62.4% 46.5% 62.6% 35.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 31/37 5.5 3.3 63.2% 67.8% 50.8% 59.2% 53.3% 61.6% 36.6%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 7/7 8.4 4.9 57.4% 72.8% 51.9% 46.2% 37.8% 63.9% 34.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 12/12 7.9 5.4 60.1% 66.8% 46.4% 58.8% 36.7% 58.8% 32.8%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 2/2 8.5 5.0 54.5% 74.9% 49.2% 51.4% 33.3% 62.9% 31.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/15 5.9 3.1 62.1% 69.4% 48.7% 47.6% 37.5% 61.5% 33.6%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/21 6.2 2.4 61.7% 70.9% 55.6% 55.8% 36.6% 65.0% 32.2%
27 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2% 2008 2/2 5.0 18.0 51.6% 72.8% 30.8% 61.1% 39.0% 52.5% 39.6%
28 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.4% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9% — 115/126 6.0 3.6 61.0% 69.6% 50.8% 56.5% 43.1% 62.2% 34.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Kristian Pless
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1512 115.3 +0.37 -0.73 1.081 51.1% +36 — — 33.3% -0.50 — — — -0.24
19 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15 2000 1507 114.5 -1.58 +0.79 0.687 43.9% +16 — — 27.3% -1.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
20 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10 2001 1662 127.6 +0.83 -1.40 0.942 48.9% -41 -69 -106 56.0% +0.36 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.5 +0.18
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1665 129.1 -0.41 -1.13 0.952 49.1% +34 -142 -129 43.8% -0.31 4–10 (29%) 5–10 (33%) 93.2 +0.31
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1611 110.7 +1.63 -3.19 0.959 49.3% +14 — — 36.8% -0.42 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.32
23 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19 2004 1554 115.9 -1.68 -2.74 0.796 46.5% +38 — — 31.4% -1.09 2–2 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.4 -0.03
24 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44 2005 1543 109.1 +1.45 -2.88 0.857 46.1% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.01
25 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 100.8 -0.31 2006 1627 114.5 -0.75 -2.22 0.871 47.5% -38 — -39 31.6% -1.05 2–2 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.3 +0.18
26 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) 99.5 -0.15 2007 1509 129.5 +1.72 -2.07 0.922 48.7% +21 +22 -12 31.5% -0.78 1–5 (17%) 4–10 (29%) 94.1 -0.35
27 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) 95.9 -1.24 2008 1481 100.6 -2.49 -0.88 0.834 46.4% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.34
28 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) 99.5 -0.09 2009 1482 98.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 94.6 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 110.0 -0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) 97.7 +0.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 98.7 +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80 — 1713 126.6 +0.14 -1.77 0.910 48.4% +9 -81 -67 38.9% -0.54 12–25 (32%) 19–34 (36%) 88.9 +0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.