H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hyung-Taik Lee vs Michael Berrer H2H: 1-0
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Berrer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2006 Beijing fourth round 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2006* | Beijing | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 4-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Michael Berrer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Michael Berrer | #952 | #42 | 960 | 1,783 | 88 | 143 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyung-Taik Lee | Michael Berrer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #152 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #74 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #100 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #182 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |