H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hyung-Taik Lee vs Satoshi Iwabuchi H2H: 1-0
Hyung-Taik Lee holds a 1–0 lead over Satoshi Iwabuchi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hyung-Taik Lee leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2008 Tokyo second round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 50
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2008* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R64 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-1 6-4 | Satoshi Iwabuchi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Satoshi Iwabuchi | #1,339 | #223 | 160 | 1,500 | 4 | 16 | 20.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyung-Taik Lee | Satoshi Iwabuchi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #910 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #543 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #324 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,413 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #506 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,386 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #369 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #398 | 1,403 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |