H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Hyung-Taik Lee vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 1-2

Wayne Arthurs holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wayne Arthurs leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2004 Japan Open round of 32 6-2 7-6(2).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hyung-Taik Lee
KOR Age 50 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Wayne Arthurs
AUS Age 55 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hyung-Taik Lee #69 6-2 7-6(2) Wayne Arthurs #98 Match data Oct 7, 2004* R32 Japan Open International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Wayne Arthurs #100 (w/o) Hyung-Taik Lee #64 Match data Sep 30, 2004* R32 Shanghai Masters International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Wayne Arthurs #53 6-4 6-3 Hyung-Taik Lee #80 Match data Aug 14, 2002* R64 Indianapolis ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hyung-Taik Lee #1,256 #36 864 1,798 121 156 43.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Wayne Arthurs #368 #44 833 1,781 123 153 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Wayne Arthurs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1995 1–1 50.0% #241 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1996 0–1 0.0% #283 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1999 1–2 33.3% #191 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2000 7–5 58.3% #90 1,642 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2001 9–19 32.1% #116 1,559 0 0 1996 1–2 33.3% #561 1,499 0 0
26 2002 11–14 44.0% #87 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2003 18–23 43.9% #56 1,606 0 1 1998 4–3 57.1% #187 1,568 0 0
28 2004 16–16 50.0% #59 1,693 0 1 1999 12–11 52.2% #105 1,651 0 0
29 2005 10–19 34.5% #107 1,625 0 1 2000 13–18 41.9% #83 1,700 0 0
30 2006 18–15 54.5% #49 1,736 0 1 2001 19–23 45.2% #77 1,637 0 0
31 2007 21–23 47.7% #51 1,769 0 1 2002 23–24 48.9% #52 1,701 0 0
32 2008 9–17 34.6% #107 1,611 0 1 2003 11–22 33.3% #117 1,612 0 0
33 2009 0–1 0.0% #871 1,580 0 1 2004 13–20 39.4% #101 1,557 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 17–18 48.6% #97 1,621 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2006 6–10 37.5% #161 1,625 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2007 4–2 66.7% #244 1,667 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Wayne Arthurs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 3 14 17 17.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 16 14 30 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — — 1999 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — —
29 2005 5 11 16 31.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 9 10 19 47.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
30 2006 14 11 25 56.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 10 15 25 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2007 15 15 30 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2002 8 14 22 36.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2008 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 7 11 18 38.9% 1 8 9 11.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
33 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 11 14 25 44.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
Career — 84 107 191 44.0% 20 27 47 42.6% 17 19 36 47.2% 0 3 3 0.0% — 68 91 159 42.8% 18 31 49 36.7% 34 27 61 55.7% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 199/206 of Hyung-Taik Lee's and 246/276 of Wayne Arthurs's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Wayne Arthurs
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 2/3 7.5 3.5 49.9% 77.4% 60.4% 85.7% 12.5% 68.9% 34.5%
27 2003 40/41 3.5 2.0 63.5% 68.1% 51.1% 53.0% 35.7% 62.0% 38.2% 1998 6/7 18.2 6.0 53.2% 85.4% 55.7% 85.1% 29.4% 71.8% 31.2%
28 2004 29/32 3.4 2.3 64.4% 69.4% 52.1% 53.8% 44.6% 63.6% 36.2% 1999 21/23 17.0 4.1 56.2% 83.6% 58.5% 69.9% 26.0% 72.5% 29.2%
29 2005 28/29 3.4 2.3 61.0% 68.0% 51.0% 54.1% 37.2% 61.8% 34.9% 2000 22/31 15.3 6.6 53.1% 79.6% 56.9% 65.9% 32.0% 69.0% 27.2%
30 2006 32/33 3.7 1.6 66.9% 68.9% 52.8% 60.1% 48.4% 63.9% 37.4% 2001 37/42 15.4 5.2 53.2% 81.3% 56.6% 67.2% 41.3% 69.8% 31.6%
31 2007 44/44 3.0 1.6 63.0% 70.3% 52.7% 53.0% 31.2% 64.0% 37.1% 2002 38/47 16.4 5.3 58.2% 81.0% 53.9% 72.7% 30.8% 69.7% 31.0%
32 2008 25/26 2.8 2.5 63.8% 65.5% 48.3% 52.8% 39.7% 59.3% 36.6% 2003 33/33 14.6 4.6 57.5% 78.5% 53.1% 61.1% 28.5% 67.6% 26.5%
33 2009 1/1 0.0 3.0 55.6% 60.0% 50.0% 63.6% 33.3% 55.6% 37.8% 2004 30/33 14.8 5.5 56.2% 77.6% 53.2% 72.0% 35.2% 66.6% 29.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 35/35 15.2 5.1 55.3% 82.1% 55.4% 65.2% 24.4% 70.2% 30.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 16/16 19.3 4.8 56.9% 81.0% 53.9% 61.1% 31.8% 69.4% 28.8%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 6/6 18.3 5.8 59.3% 69.2% 46.3% 60.5% 33.6% 60.3% 27.2%
Career — 199/277 3.3 2.0 63.7% 68.6% 51.5% 54.4% 38.7% 62.6% 36.9% — 246/276 15.8 5.2 55.8% 80.3% 54.9% 67.7% 31.3% 69.1% 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hyung-Taik Lee Wayne Arthurs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1995 1510 105.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–0 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1996 1497 100.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1999 1498 110.3 — — — — — — — 37.5% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2000 1643 126.3 — — — — +16 — — 55.2% +0.38 0–1 4–2 (67%) — +0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2001 1560 126.2 — — — — -10 +45 — 37.1% -0.71 3–6 (33%) 5–3 (63%) — -0.31 1996 1500 104.7 -0.05 -0.39 1.112 51.2% — — — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.13
26 2002 1626 130.4 — — — — -62 -53 +45 47.8% -0.10 3–6 (33%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2003 1607 137.1 +0.37 +1.31 1.005 49.8% +38 -41 -12 43.6% -0.18 6–7 (46%) 5–12 (29%) — -1.24 1998 1568 120.7 +4.91 -3.72 1.108 51.8% +19 -8 — 52.6% 0.00 1–1 4–3 (57%) — -0.21
28 2004 1694 132.8 0.00 +0.22 0.996 50.1% -22 -76 +2 51.3% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.09 1999 1652 125.2 +6.73 -4.44 1.062 50.8% -84 — +63 53.1% 0.00 3–3 (50%) 15–11 (58%) — +0.57
29 2005 1626 129.9 -0.24 -0.93 0.913 48.4% -33 +14 +61 39.7% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.85 2000 1700 134.3 +4.47 -5.48 0.877 48.7% -6 -214 +1 45.1% -0.21 2–5 (29%) 13–13 (50%) — -0.74
30 2006 1737 133.5 +1.59 +0.54 1.037 50.7% -41 — -11 52.3% +0.01 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.52 2001 1637 134.5 +6.51 -3.67 1.047 50.8% -26 -53 +51 49.1% +0.21 7–9 (44%) 13–22 (37%) — -0.69
31 2007 1770 137.1 +0.81 +0.33 1.029 50.3% +8 -188 -69 47.7% -0.11 5–7 (42%) 9–14 (39%) — +0.89 2002 1701 132.5 +5.52 -5.12 1.021 50.5% -74 -103 +52 48.0% -0.03 12–9 (57%) 19–23 (45%) — +0.07
32 2008 1611 130.0 -2.82 -0.10 0.900 48.3% +78 -31 — 43.8% -0.59 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.14 2003 1612 126.7 +4.04 -7.94 0.817 47.1% +12 -96 +126 37.8% -0.76 5–4 (56%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.96
33 2009 1580 100.2 -0.70 -4.74 0.851 47.1% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.05 2004 1557 126.0 +1.95 -5.15 0.873 48.5% +46 -38 +71 41.7% -0.36 4–8 (33%) 11–17 (39%) — +0.89
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1621 128.8 +5.90 -5.67 1.006 49.9% +11 -77 +14 46.6% -0.06 7–5 (58%) 13–18 (42%) — +0.19
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1625 120.7 +3.77 -4.98 0.940 49.0% -21 — +42 39.5% -0.53 3–3 (50%) 6–10 (38%) — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1668 109.1 -1.63 -3.62 0.685 44.3% -80 — +91 60.0% +0.45 2–0 3–4 (43%) — +0.58
Career — 1799 138.7 +0.12 +0.29 0.985 49.7% -2 -43 +2 45.8% -0.27 37–52 (42%) 54–58 (48%) 99.2 -0.80 — 1781 134.2 +4.75 -5.22 0.952 49.4% -13 -84 +54 46.1% -0.16 46–48 (49%) 109–134 (45%) 100.5 -0.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.