H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hyung-Taik Lee vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 1-2
Wayne Arthurs holds a 2–1 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Wayne Arthurs leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Hyung-Taik Lee won the 2004 Tokyo third round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2004* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hyung-Taik Lee | 6-2 7-6(2) | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2004* | Shanghai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | (w/o) | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2002 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Wayne Arthurs | 6-4 6-3 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hyung-Taik Lee | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |