H2H data updated: 2026-07-14 14:15 UTC

I. Nastase vs R. Laver H2H: 7-2

I. Nastase holds a 7–2 lead over R. Laver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, I. Nastase leads 3–2 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, I. Nastase won the 1977 Wct Challenge Cup round-robin match 6-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

I. Nastase
ROU Age 79 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
7 – 2
9 main draw meetings
R. Laver
AUS Age 87 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 14, 1977 Wct Challenge Cup ATP 250 RR Carpet I. Nastase #9 6-5 6-4 R. Laver #106 Match data
Dec 2, 1976 Las Vegas ATP 250 RR Carpet I. Nastase #3 6-3 6-1 R. Laver #72 Match data
Feb 15, 1976 Wct Challenge Cup ATP 250 RR Hard I. Nastase #7 7-6 6-1 4-6 6-3 R. Laver #8 Match data
Oct 26, 1975* World Invitational Classic ATP 250 F Clay I. Nastase #7 5-7 7-6 6-4 R. Laver #11 Match data
Apr 5, 1975* Tuscon ATP 250 QF Hard I. Nastase #9 6-3 3-6 6-2 R. Laver #4 Match data
Nov 3, 1974* World Invitational Classic ATP 250 SF Carpet I. Nastase #9 6-3 6-4 R. Laver #3 Match data
Nov 7, 1971* Wembley ATP 250 F Hard I. Nastase 3-6 6-3 3-6 6-4 6-4 R. Laver Match data
Nov 21, 1970* Wembley ATP 250 QF Carpet R. Laver 6-1 6-2 I. Nastase Match data
Feb 7, 1970* Philadelphia Wct ATP 250 QF Carpet R. Laver 4-6 6-2 8-6 I. Nastase Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
I. Nastase #1,075 #1 0 2,260 859 331 72.2% 2 4 3 0 55 64
R. Laver #662 #3 0 2,300 576 147 79.7% 5 2 0 0 65 72

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age I. Nastase R. Laver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 41–14 74.5% — 1,756 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 1969 27–22 55.1% — 1,824 0 5 — — — — — — —
23 1970 60–20 75.0% — 1,970 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 1971 73–13 84.9% — 2,079 0 14 — — — — — — —
25 1972 106–20 84.1% — 2,157 1 25 — — — — — — —
26 1973 118–17 87.4% #1 2,208 2 41 — — — — — — —
27 1974 80–21 79.2% #10 2,153 2 48 — — — — — — —
28 1975 91–21 81.2% #7 2,170 2 54 — — — — — — —
29 1976 76–17 81.7% #3 2,179 2 59 1968 73–19 79.3% — 1,881 1 13
30 1977 44–18 71.0% #9 2,092 2 62 1969 97–14 87.4% — 2,161 5 29
31 1978 45–21 68.2% #16 2,059 2 64 1970 89–15 85.6% — 2,213 5 42
32 1979 28–25 52.8% #49 1,795 2 64 1971 85–20 81.0% — 2,155 5 49
33 1980 19–24 44.2% #77 1,740 2 64 1972 50–16 75.8% — 2,016 5 54
34 1981 26–27 49.1% #74 1,730 2 64 1973 67–16 80.7% #8 2,088 5 61
35 1982 14–24 36.8% #86 1,633 2 64 1974 45–10 81.8% #4 2,115 5 67
36 1983 6–11 35.3% #118 1,595 2 64 1975 52–13 80.0% #10 2,087 5 72
37 1984 4–12 25.0% #202 1,574 2 64 1976 9–11 45.0% #73 1,995 5 72
38 1985 1–4 20.0% #431 1,535 2 64 1977 5–9 35.7% #124 1,927 5 72
39 — — — — — — — 1978 4–3 57.1% #216 1,917 5 72
40 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% #662 1,901 5 72