H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Daniele Bracciali H2H: 1-1
Igor Andreev and Daniele Bracciali are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on carpet, while Daniele Bracciali leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniele Bracciali won the 2006 Rotterdam third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2006* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Daniele Bracciali | 6-2 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Oct 15, 2005* | Moscow | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Igor Andreev | 6-4 6-1 | Daniele Bracciali | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Daniele Bracciali | #923 | #49 | 752 | 1,710 | 33 | 51 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Daniele Bracciali | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #950 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #65 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #258 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |