H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Eduardo Schwank H2H: 1-2
Eduardo Schwank holds a 2–1 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Eduardo Schwank leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Eduardo Schwank won the 2011 Buenos Aires third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2011* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Eduardo Schwank | 6-4 7-6(5) | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Feb 3, 2011* | Santiago | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-3 7-6(4) | Eduardo Schwank | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2008* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Eduardo Schwank | 6-3 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Eduardo Schwank | #1,858 | #48 | 1,380 | 1,742 | 37 | 61 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Eduardo Schwank | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #118 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |