H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Fernando Vicente in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2005 Valencia third round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2005* | Valencia | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-4 7-5 | Fernando Vicente | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |