H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Gaston Gaudio H2H: 0-1
Gaston Gaudio holds a 1–0 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gaston Gaudio leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gaston Gaudio won the 2004 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2004* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Gaston Gaudio | 6-4 7-5 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Gaston Gaudio | #1,025 | #5 | 2,440 | 1,998 | 253 | 188 | 57.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Gaston Gaudio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #72 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #34 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #21 | 1,828 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #34 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #10 | 1,805 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 54–20 | 73.0% | #10 | 1,871 | 1 | 8 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #34 | 1,697 | 1 | 8 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #182 | 1,625 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #969 | 1,605 | 1 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #167 | 1,524 | 1 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #326 | 1,467 | 1 | 8 |