H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Guillermo Garcia-Lopez H2H: 3-0
Igor Andreev holds a 3–0 lead over Guillermo Garcia-Lopez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Igor Andreev leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2012 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2013 | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Clay | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | 6-1 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Apr 14, 2012* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-4 6-2 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Jul 12, 2008* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Igor Andreev | 7-6(2) 5-7 7-6(5) | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
| Aug 4, 2005* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | #1,009 | #23 | 1,465 | 1,938 | 299 | 353 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #244 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #91 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #90 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #33 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #65 | 1,712 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #62 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,740 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #70 | 1,747 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #105 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #144 | 1,694 | 0 | 5 |