H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2008 Rome Masters second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2008* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-4 7-5 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Igor Andreev | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |