H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Jose Acasuso H2H: 1-4
Jose Acasuso holds a 4–1 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jose Acasuso leads 4–1 on clay. Most recently, Jose Acasuso won the 2008 Buenos Aires quarterfinal 3-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 43
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2008* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 3-6 6-1 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Apr 17, 2007* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-4 6-1 | Jose Acasuso | Match data |
| May 19, 2005* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2004* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-3 6-0 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Sep 12, 2003* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Jose Acasuso | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jose Acasuso | #1,107 | #20 | 1,640 | 1,830 | 181 | 178 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Jose Acasuso | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #41 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #101 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #67 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #27 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #48 | 1,697 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #253 | 1,666 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #255 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |