H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Igor Andreev vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-4

Lukasz Kubot holds a 4–0 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lukasz Kubot leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Lukasz Kubot
POL Age 44 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lukasz Kubot #130 6-1 7-5 6-2 Igor Andreev #416 Match data Jun 26, 2013* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Lukasz Kubot #56 2-6 6-2 6-4 Igor Andreev #41 Match data Feb 13, 2010* SF Costa Do Sauipe ATP 250 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #179 3-2 (ret.) Igor Andreev #32 Match data May 8, 2009* R16 Belgrade ATP 250 Clay
Lukasz Kubot #327 6-4 6-2 Igor Andreev #55 Match data Aug 12, 2004* R32 Sopot International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Igor Andreev #1,016 #18 2,490 1,929 223 216 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lukasz Kubot #1,054 #41 977 1,870 82 120 40.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Igor Andreev Lukasz Kubot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 27–27 50.0% #50 1,664 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,833 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,761 0 3 2004 1–1 50.0% #219 1,514 0 0
23 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3 2005 0–1 0.0% #142 1,484 0 0
24 2008 40–28 58.8% #19 1,895 0 3 2006 3–7 30.0% #125 1,552 0 0
25 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,694 0 3 2007 0–3 0.0% #222 1,485 0 0
26 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3 2009 9–9 50.0% #101 1,730 0 0
28 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3 2010 15–24 38.5% #70 1,653 0 0
29 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3 2011 17–17 50.0% #57 1,818 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2012 21–27 43.8% #74 1,716 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 10–17 37.0% #72 1,667 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2014 5–12 29.4% #170 1,670 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2015 1–2 33.3% #471 1,698 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Igor Andreev Lukasz Kubot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 12 8 20 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2007 9 9 18 50.0% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2009 14 19 33 42.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2010 6 9 15 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 7 11 18 38.9% 6 11 17 35.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 5 9 14 35.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 10 15 25 40.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 99 189 47.6% 108 92 200 54.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 9 8 17 52.9% — 33 62 95 34.7% 36 45 81 44.4% 13 12 25 52.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/439 of Igor Andreev's and 199/202 of Lukasz Kubot's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Igor Andreev Lukasz Kubot
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 7/8 2.9 3.1 60.9% 70.7% 52.0% 52.3% 43.5% 63.2% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 51/54 4.6 3.2 60.9% 68.8% 51.7% 56.4% 44.9% 62.0% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 66/66 4.2 2.1 61.7% 70.1% 53.4% 58.2% 41.8% 63.6% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 26/26 4.3 2.9 64.0% 70.3% 50.9% 56.3% 40.2% 63.4% 36.6% 2004 2/2 1.5 3.0 62.7% 73.6% 41.1% 52.8% 16.7% 61.9% 40.0%
23 2007 53/57 4.1 1.8 68.2% 69.2% 55.0% 57.1% 43.3% 64.7% 38.2% 2005 1/1 0.0 1.0 83.0% 47.7% 55.6% 20.0% 0.0% 49.1% 27.5%
24 2008 65/68 6.1 2.5 64.2% 72.4% 54.0% 60.7% 41.9% 65.8% 35.8% 2006 10/10 3.3 4.3 61.6% 62.6% 44.2% 52.3% 33.1% 55.4% 33.8%
25 2009 56/57 5.3 2.8 61.7% 72.1% 52.1% 60.8% 42.2% 64.4% 36.1% 2007 3/3 2.7 2.0 60.8% 58.5% 40.6% 21.7% 46.8% 50.4% 41.3%
26 2010 36/36 5.0 3.1 56.7% 71.4% 50.8% 62.2% 44.2% 62.4% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 39/39 5.1 3.1 59.7% 70.2% 50.2% 53.8% 40.2% 62.0% 35.9% 2009 18/18 4.2 3.0 62.5% 70.6% 49.6% 57.5% 37.8% 63.0% 36.1%
28 2012 27/27 5.1 2.4 61.2% 72.6% 54.5% 45.0% 40.1% 65.6% 36.1% 2010 38/39 4.6 4.7 62.5% 66.5% 45.5% 54.0% 47.5% 58.7% 37.0%
29 2013 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.8% 50.9% 36.0% 36.4% 66.7% 46.3% 31.5% 2011 34/34 5.1 5.8 61.4% 70.1% 46.4% 56.6% 52.7% 60.9% 37.0%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 47/48 4.3 4.3 61.4% 69.3% 48.3% 58.0% 39.7% 61.2% 37.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 26/27 6.5 4.5 62.6% 67.8% 45.0% 52.0% 41.4% 59.2% 37.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 17/17 7.6 5.7 59.9% 69.1% 48.8% 57.0% 33.4% 60.8% 32.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 8.0 4.3 65.8% 68.0% 54.5% 69.4% 14.3% 63.4% 31.7%
Career — 427/439 4.9 2.6 62.3% 70.7% 52.7% 57.4% 42.4% 63.8% 37.0% — 199/202 5.0 4.6 61.9% 68.2% 46.9% 55.2% 41.9% 60.1% 36.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Igor Andreev Lukasz Kubot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2003 1565 122.4 +0.10 +2.20 1.099 51.5% +22 -32 — 52.6% +0.05 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1664 130.3 -0.34 -0.27 0.971 49.3% -116 +43 -35 49.3% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1834 142.3 +0.89 +1.34 1.067 51.1% -112 -7 -145 53.6% +0.34 11–10 (52%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1761 134.8 +0.73 +0.41 1.000 49.9% -8 +8 — 49.3% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.16 2004 1514 104.6 +0.89 +0.01 1.051 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — -0.09
23 2007 1770 145.0 +1.90 +1.28 1.084 51.2% -68 +86 — 52.7% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.84 2005 1484 98.6 +2.62 -3.59 0.539 38.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.11
24 2008 1896 149.4 +2.70 +0.06 1.048 50.7% -27 -33 -267 57.0% +0.22 11–11 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.72 2006 1552 111.5 -2.84 -0.81 0.759 45.1% +43 — — 36.7% -1.37 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.02
25 2009 1695 142.4 +0.78 -0.48 1.013 49.9% +11 +108 +29 49.0% -0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–14 (42%) — +3.05 2007 1486 99.1 -3.22 -0.28 0.831 45.7% — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2010 1701 143.1 -0.76 +0.75 0.999 50.2% -2 +101 — 47.7% -0.12 6–6 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.32 2008 1507 103.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1689 134.9 -1.12 -1.08 0.947 48.9% +23 -16 -13 45.7% -0.24 6–12 (33%) 5–13 (28%) — -1.23 2009 1730 130.5 -0.39 +0.74 0.974 49.4% -21 -13 — 51.2% -0.07 2–5 (29%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.34
28 2012 1684 133.7 +1.84 -0.99 1.048 50.4% -45 +85 — 50.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.74 2010 1653 134.9 -3.52 +0.17 0.895 48.1% +52 -19 -182 41.7% -0.46 2–7 (22%) 4–9 (31%) — +0.09
29 2013 1587 89.3 -1.27 -3.47 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.13 2011 1819 141.7 -1.34 -0.12 0.947 49.2% -93 -18 -86 49.0% -0.07 10–7 (59%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.47
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1716 137.7 -1.80 +0.15 0.952 49.5% -31 +48 -3 45.8% -0.14 6–8 (43%) 8–10 (44%) — +0.63
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1667 126.1 -3.42 -0.55 0.908 48.2% -63 +74 +118 41.1% -0.52 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.16
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1670 124.3 -1.32 -2.59 0.827 47.1% -101 +15 +100 40.8% -0.73 1–6 (14%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.27
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1698 119.7 -2.83 +2.52 0.866 48.0% -40 — — 42.9% -0.72 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1654 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 144.8 +0.84 +0.23 1.023 50.3% -37 +42 -79 51.1% +0.06 75–83 (47%) 95–106 (47%) 98.7 -0.42 — 1871 133.5 -2.13 -0.20 0.909 48.4% -30 +7 +8 43.9% -0.40 26–45 (37%) 39–39 (50%) 98.9 +0.69

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.