H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-4
Lukasz Kubot holds a 4–0 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Lukasz Kubot leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2013 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2013* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Lukasz Kubot | 6-1 7-5 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2010* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| May 8, 2009* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 3-2 (ret.) | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2004* | Sopot | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Igor Andreev | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |