H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 3-1
Igor Andreev holds a 3–1 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Igor Andreev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2009 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2009* | Casablanca | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-1 6-3 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Aug 27, 2008* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
| Sep 14, 2007* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marc Gicquel | 6-4 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2007* | Dubai | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 | Marc Gicquel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Marc Gicquel | #857 | #37 | 1,448 | 1,785 | 92 | 113 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Marc Gicquel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #223 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #123 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #50 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #70 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #54 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #58 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #151 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #120 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #342 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |