H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Igor Andreev vs Marc Gicquel H2H: 3-1

Igor Andreev holds a 3–1 lead over Marc Gicquel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Igor Andreev leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2009 Casablanca quarterfinal 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
Marc Gicquel
FRA Age 49 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Igor Andreev #22 6-1 6-3 Marc Gicquel #50 Match data Apr 11, 2009* QF Casablanca ATP 250 Clay
Igor Andreev #23 7-6(3) 6-4 6-4 Marc Gicquel #41 Match data Aug 27, 2008* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Marc Gicquel #67 6-4 6-3 Igor Andreev #38 Match data Sep 14, 2007* R16 Tiriac Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Igor Andreev #139 6-7(4) 6-4 7-5 Marc Gicquel #41 Match data Mar 1, 2007* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Igor Andreev #1,016 #18 2,490 1,929 223 216 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marc Gicquel #857 #37 1,448 1,787 92 113 44.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Igor Andreev Marc Gicquel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2004 27–27 50.0% #50 1,664 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,833 0 3 — — — — — — —
22 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,761 0 3 — — — — — — —
23 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3 — — — — — — —
24 2008 40–28 58.8% #19 1,895 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,694 0 3 2002 1–1 50.0% #223 1,500 0 0
26 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3 2004 1–2 33.3% #170 1,520 0 0
28 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3 2005 3–2 60.0% #123 1,544 0 0
29 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3 2006 17–12 58.6% #50 1,750 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2007 21–25 45.7% #70 1,711 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2008 21–24 46.7% #54 1,697 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2009 21–25 45.7% #58 1,717 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2010 5–12 29.4% #151 1,642 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,576 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2012 0–1 0.0% #152 1,591 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2013 0–5 0.0% #120 1,620 0 0
37 — — — — — — — 2014 2–1 66.7% #342 1,639 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Igor Andreev Marc Gicquel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 12 8 20 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 9 9 18 50.0% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 14 19 33 42.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2002 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2010 6 9 15 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 7 11 18 38.9% 6 11 17 35.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
29 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 9 6 15 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 5 12 17 29.4% 8 8 16 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 13 21 38.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 13 16 29 44.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 99 189 47.6% 108 92 200 54.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 9 8 17 52.9% — 43 59 102 42.2% 26 33 59 44.1% 11 15 26 42.3% 12 6 18 66.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/439 of Igor Andreev's and 205/205 of Marc Gicquel's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Igor Andreev Marc Gicquel
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 7/8 2.9 3.1 60.9% 70.7% 52.0% 52.3% 43.5% 63.2% 40.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 51/54 4.6 3.2 60.9% 68.8% 51.7% 56.4% 44.9% 62.0% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 66/66 4.2 2.1 61.7% 70.1% 53.4% 58.2% 41.8% 63.6% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 26/26 4.3 2.9 64.0% 70.3% 50.9% 56.3% 40.2% 63.4% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 53/57 4.1 1.8 68.2% 69.2% 55.0% 57.1% 43.3% 64.7% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 65/68 6.1 2.5 64.2% 72.4% 54.0% 60.7% 41.9% 65.8% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 56/57 5.3 2.8 61.7% 72.1% 52.1% 60.8% 42.2% 64.4% 36.1% 2002 2/2 9.0 1.5 52.9% 72.9% 53.5% 87.5% 50.0% 63.1% 24.8%
26 2010 36/36 5.0 3.1 56.7% 71.4% 50.8% 62.2% 44.2% 62.4% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 39/39 5.1 3.1 59.7% 70.2% 50.2% 53.8% 40.2% 62.0% 35.9% 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 60.1% 62.3% 54.0% 15.7% 35.2% 59.0% 36.3%
28 2012 27/27 5.1 2.4 61.2% 72.6% 54.5% 45.0% 40.1% 65.6% 36.1% 2005 5/5 4.8 1.8 63.1% 72.8% 48.4% 52.4% 44.6% 64.0% 41.1%
29 2013 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.8% 50.9% 36.0% 36.4% 66.7% 46.3% 31.5% 2006 29/29 6.8 1.6 54.9% 75.8% 50.6% 66.8% 37.8% 64.1% 36.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 46/46 6.0 1.9 57.9% 74.2% 50.2% 59.6% 38.2% 63.8% 34.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 45/45 6.8 2.2 58.5% 73.2% 49.1% 62.8% 43.5% 63.2% 36.4%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 46/46 5.8 2.8 55.7% 73.1% 51.9% 65.3% 39.3% 63.8% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 17/17 5.4 2.7 54.0% 69.5% 48.9% 50.4% 46.6% 59.4% 34.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 4.3 4.3 53.8% 71.8% 52.6% 40.3% 27.8% 62.6% 28.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 1/1 4.0 2.0 61.4% 72.5% 50.0% 42.9% 40.0% 63.9% 42.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 3.2 3.8 53.0% 61.9% 43.9% 58.1% 39.2% 52.9% 27.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 7.7 1.0 64.8% 77.5% 53.7% 53.6% 41.9% 69.0% 40.0%
Career — 427/439 4.9 2.6 62.3% 70.7% 52.7% 57.4% 42.4% 63.8% 37.0% — 205/205 6.0 2.3 56.8% 73.0% 50.3% 60.8% 40.4% 63.1% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Igor Andreev Marc Gicquel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2003 1565 122.4 +0.10 +2.20 1.099 51.5% +22 -32 — 52.6% +0.05 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 100.9 -0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 1664 130.3 -0.34 -0.27 0.971 49.3% -116 +43 -35 49.3% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 14–9 (61%) 108.2 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2005 1834 142.3 +0.89 +1.34 1.067 51.1% -112 -7 -145 53.6% +0.34 11–10 (52%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2006 1761 134.8 +0.73 +0.41 1.000 49.9% -8 +8 — 49.3% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 98.8 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2007 1770 145.0 +1.90 +1.28 1.084 51.2% -68 +86 — 52.7% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 10–14 (42%) 100.8 -2.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2008 1896 149.4 +2.70 +0.06 1.048 50.7% -27 -33 -267 57.0% +0.22 11–11 (50%) 20–15 (57%) 102.1 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2009 1695 142.4 +0.78 -0.48 1.013 49.9% +11 +108 +29 49.0% -0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–14 (42%) 93.6 +3.05 2002 1501 101.9 +0.60 -0.57 0.672 47.2% — — — 50.0% -0.25 — 0–1 — +0.17
26 2010 1701 143.1 -0.76 +0.75 0.999 50.2% -2 +101 — 47.7% -0.12 6–6 (50%) 7–8 (47%) 98.9 -0.32 2003 1471 94.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2011 1689 134.9 -1.12 -1.08 0.947 48.9% +23 -16 -13 45.7% -0.24 6–12 (33%) 5–13 (28%) 90.0 -1.23 2004 1520 105.8 -1.54 -0.60 0.885 47.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 1–0 1–1 — +0.55
28 2012 1684 133.7 +1.84 -0.99 1.048 50.4% -45 +85 — 50.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–11 (42%) 94.6 -0.74 2005 1544 107.2 +1.50 +0.12 1.141 52.0% +14 — — 54.5% +0.27 1–0 — — 0.00
29 2013 1587 89.3 -1.27 -3.47 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.13 2006 1750 135.4 +1.93 -0.94 1.024 50.4% -8 -166 — 58.9% +0.30 5–4 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 102.6 +0.08
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1711 135.5 +0.72 -1.60 0.962 49.2% +21 -89 -185 45.9% -0.15 7–6 (54%) 9–6 (60%) 104.0 -0.22
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 134.8 +0.16 -0.18 0.988 49.9% -51 -11 +5 45.9% -0.16 4–8 (33%) 10–9 (53%) 96.8 +0.69
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1718 138.5 +0.34 +0.15 1.022 50.3% -16 -6 -26 49.1% -0.07 4–8 (33%) 6–7 (46%) 96.3 +0.21
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1643 123.6 -2.04 -2.07 0.852 47.8% +67 -11 -42 35.0% -0.90 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.86
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1576 104.0 -0.75 -0.94 0.755 45.2% — — — 10.0% -1.70 — 0–1 — +0.29
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1592 108.8 +2.93 -4.09 1.168 52.6% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — -0.07
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1621 111.9 -3.55 -2.25 0.591 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.08 — 0–2 — +0.06
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1640 117.0 +2.04 +0.21 1.292 53.2% +39 — — 71.4% +0.86 0–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.13
Career — 1930 144.8 +0.84 +0.23 1.023 50.3% -37 +42 -79 51.1% +0.06 75–83 (47%) 95–106 (47%) 98.7 -0.42 — 1787 131.8 +0.34 -0.77 0.970 49.5% -4 -57 -51 46.1% -0.22 22–30 (42%) 40–38 (51%) 99.1 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.