H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Igor Andreev vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-1

Igor Andreev and Marcos Baghdatis are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marcos Baghdatis won the 2010 New Haven round of 32 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Igor Andreev
RUS Age 43 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Marcos Baghdatis
CYP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcos Baghdatis #18 6-2 6-4 Igor Andreev #102 Match data Aug 25, 2010* R32 New Haven ATP 250 Hard
Igor Andreev #125 2-6 6-1 6-3 6-4 Marcos Baghdatis #19 Match data Jun 5, 2007* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Igor Andreev #1,016 #18 2,490 1,929 223 216 50.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marcos Baghdatis #179 #8 2,111 1,952 327 274 54.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Igor Andreev Marcos Baghdatis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 2003 4–4 50.0% #88 1,565 0 0 2004 2–2 50.0% #159 1,576 0 0
20 2004 27–27 50.0% #50 1,664 0 0 2005 11–12 47.8% #55 1,699 0 0
21 2005 37–29 56.1% #26 1,833 0 3 2006 33–20 62.3% #12 1,842 0 1
22 2006 13–13 50.0% #91 1,761 0 3 2007 44–22 66.7% #16 1,938 0 2
23 2007 31–26 54.4% #33 1,769 0 3 2008 12–12 50.0% #98 1,814 0 2
24 2008 40–28 58.8% #19 1,895 0 3 2009 18–16 52.9% #42 1,784 0 3
25 2009 27–30 47.4% #35 1,694 0 3 2010 41–27 60.3% #20 1,851 0 4
26 2010 17–19 47.2% #79 1,700 0 3 2011 26–27 49.1% #44 1,844 0 4
27 2011 15–24 38.5% #115 1,688 0 3 2012 33–25 56.9% #36 1,908 0 4
28 2012 12–15 44.4% #110 1,684 0 3 2013 14–22 38.9% #87 1,806 0 4
29 2013 0–1 0.0% #1015 1,587 0 3 2014 7–11 38.9% #85 1,704 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 2015 26–19 57.8% #46 1,870 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 2016 26–23 53.1% #36 1,884 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 2017 18–16 52.9% #102 1,839 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2018 12–17 41.4% #124 1,728 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2019 4–3 57.1% #179 1,743 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Igor Andreev Marcos Baghdatis
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2005 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
21 2005 10 13 23 43.5% 19 12 31 61.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2006 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2006 12 8 20 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 23 15 38 60.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 8 2 10 80.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 2007 9 9 18 50.0% 22 14 36 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
24 2008 22 15 37 59.5% 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2009 16 12 28 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2009 14 19 33 42.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 33 18 51 64.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 2010 6 9 15 40.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 18 18 36 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
27 2011 7 11 18 38.9% 6 11 17 35.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 24 16 40 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
28 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 14 15 29 48.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2013 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 5 8 13 38.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 17 13 30 56.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 17 14 31 54.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 90 99 189 47.6% 108 92 200 54.0% 16 17 33 48.5% 9 8 17 52.9% — 233 182 415 56.1% 30 50 80 37.5% 55 40 95 57.9% 9 2 11 81.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/439 of Igor Andreev's and 594/601 of Marcos Baghdatis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Igor Andreev Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 2003 7/8 2.9 3.1 60.9% 70.7% 52.0% 52.3% 43.5% 63.2% 40.5% 2004 2/4 11.5 7.5 51.4% 71.0% 41.1% 18.3% 61.4% 56.3% 38.1%
20 2004 51/54 4.6 3.2 60.9% 68.8% 51.7% 56.4% 44.9% 62.0% 36.8% 2005 23/23 7.5 2.6 56.7% 73.2% 52.6% 55.8% 51.8% 64.3% 37.5%
21 2005 66/66 4.2 2.1 61.7% 70.1% 53.4% 58.2% 41.8% 63.6% 38.9% 2006 53/53 7.4 3.3 52.5% 74.5% 50.5% 54.0% 44.4% 62.8% 40.2%
22 2006 26/26 4.3 2.9 64.0% 70.3% 50.9% 56.3% 40.2% 63.4% 36.6% 2007 66/66 6.8 2.7 52.6% 75.1% 54.2% 61.3% 46.5% 65.0% 39.2%
23 2007 53/57 4.1 1.8 68.2% 69.2% 55.0% 57.1% 43.3% 64.7% 38.2% 2008 24/24 8.2 3.8 54.0% 77.5% 53.3% 57.0% 35.8% 66.3% 35.2%
24 2008 65/68 6.1 2.5 64.2% 72.4% 54.0% 60.7% 41.9% 65.8% 35.8% 2009 33/34 7.2 3.0 52.8% 75.2% 51.2% 56.2% 43.9% 63.7% 39.4%
25 2009 56/57 5.3 2.8 61.7% 72.1% 52.1% 60.8% 42.2% 64.4% 36.1% 2010 68/68 7.3 2.9 51.3% 75.9% 52.1% 57.6% 43.5% 64.5% 38.6%
26 2010 36/36 5.0 3.1 56.7% 71.4% 50.8% 62.2% 44.2% 62.4% 37.6% 2011 53/53 7.5 2.9 51.3% 76.4% 51.0% 59.2% 46.0% 63.9% 36.7%
27 2011 39/39 5.1 3.1 59.7% 70.2% 50.2% 53.8% 40.2% 62.0% 35.9% 2012 55/58 6.3 3.1 54.7% 73.6% 52.4% 54.6% 43.1% 64.2% 37.9%
28 2012 27/27 5.1 2.4 61.2% 72.6% 54.5% 45.0% 40.1% 65.6% 36.1% 2013 36/36 7.6 4.3 53.0% 75.3% 51.9% 64.0% 39.1% 64.1% 34.4%
29 2013 1/1 5.0 2.0 68.8% 50.9% 36.0% 36.4% 66.7% 46.3% 31.5% 2014 18/18 6.4 4.6 52.0% 74.5% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 63.0% 35.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 45/45 7.8 3.6 54.5% 74.1% 51.1% 58.0% 45.4% 63.6% 37.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 49/49 6.0 3.3 52.3% 73.9% 53.6% 58.4% 43.5% 64.0% 36.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 34/34 7.6 3.5 52.0% 76.6% 49.9% 62.7% 39.9% 64.1% 36.3%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 28/29 9.6 3.5 56.0% 74.9% 50.9% 56.9% 37.7% 64.0% 38.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 7/7 5.7 4.1 55.2% 77.5% 46.0% 56.1% 43.2% 63.4% 37.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Igor Andreev Marcos Baghdatis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1485 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2003 1565 122.4 +0.10 +2.20 1.099 51.5% +22 -32 — 52.6% +0.05 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.48 2004 1576 118.7 -0.69 +1.61 0.871 47.4% +16 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 2–0 — -0.09
20 2004 1664 130.3 -0.34 -0.27 0.971 49.3% -116 +43 -35 49.3% -0.10 10–8 (56%) 14–9 (61%) — +0.52 2005 1700 138.3 +1.75 +0.83 1.048 50.7% +36 — — 49.3% +0.13 4–5 (44%) 8–8 (50%) — -0.74
21 2005 1834 142.3 +0.89 +1.34 1.067 51.1% -112 -7 -145 53.6% +0.34 11–10 (52%) 13–12 (52%) — +0.95 2006 1843 151.4 +0.96 +3.30 1.081 51.5% +9 -291 -70 59.3% +0.45 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -1.44
22 2006 1761 134.8 +0.73 +0.41 1.000 49.9% -8 +8 — 49.3% +0.08 9–7 (56%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.16 2007 1938 150.2 +2.29 +2.86 1.121 52.1% -36 -250 -59 61.7% +0.72 13–6 (68%) 18–16 (53%) — -0.34
23 2007 1770 145.0 +1.90 +1.28 1.084 51.2% -68 +86 — 52.7% +0.22 10–10 (50%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.84 2008 1814 141.8 +1.75 -0.01 1.045 50.5% +1 — +137 56.3% +0.06 2–5 (29%) 7–3 (70%) — -0.74
24 2008 1896 149.4 +2.70 +0.06 1.048 50.7% -27 -33 -267 57.0% +0.22 11–11 (50%) 20–15 (57%) — -0.72 2009 1785 147.9 +0.73 +2.59 1.086 51.4% +42 — +151 56.4% +0.42 1–6 (14%) 5–7 (42%) — -0.90
25 2009 1695 142.4 +0.78 -0.48 1.013 49.9% +11 +108 +29 49.0% -0.07 9–12 (43%) 10–14 (42%) — +3.05 2010 1852 156.2 +1.70 +2.21 1.087 51.3% +40 -122 -46 59.2% +0.51 12–11 (52%) 16–8 (67%) — -0.06
26 2010 1701 143.1 -0.76 +0.75 0.999 50.2% -2 +101 — 47.7% -0.12 6–6 (50%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.32 2011 1844 157.1 +1.07 +0.51 1.016 50.4% +32 -159 +46 52.2% +0.26 8–11 (42%) 13–14 (48%) — -0.79
27 2011 1689 134.9 -1.12 -1.08 0.947 48.9% +23 -16 -13 45.7% -0.24 6–12 (33%) 5–13 (28%) — -1.23 2012 1908 155.9 +1.50 +1.16 1.059 50.9% +21 -225 +14 56.4% +0.32 9–6 (60%) 13–10 (57%) — -1.33
28 2012 1684 133.7 +1.84 -0.99 1.048 50.4% -45 +85 — 50.8% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–11 (42%) — -0.74 2013 1806 154.0 +1.07 -0.98 0.959 49.3% +63 -182 +5 43.6% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 6–13 (32%) — -2.69
29 2013 1587 89.3 -1.27 -3.47 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — +0.13 2014 1705 123.0 -0.60 -0.13 0.951 48.8% +34 — +84 46.8% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.23
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1870 152.8 -0.76 +2.30 1.033 50.6% -3 -251 -6 56.9% +0.42 10–7 (59%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.74
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1884 158.0 +0.22 +1.50 1.027 50.2% +24 -227 -33 52.5% +0.08 6–7 (46%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1839 144.1 +0.48 -0.05 1.011 50.1% +31 -215 -34 52.1% +0.15 6–1 (86%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.55
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1728 136.9 +0.05 +0.78 1.058 50.5% +55 -175 +46 43.8% -0.13 3–4 (43%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.39
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1743 122.7 -0.99 +0.40 1.010 49.8% +39 — — 50.0% -0.11 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.56
Career — 1930 144.8 +0.84 +0.23 1.023 50.3% -37 +42 -79 51.1% +0.06 75–83 (47%) 95–106 (47%) 98.7 -0.42 — 1953 157.5 +0.97 +1.47 1.049 50.7% +23 -204 +4 54.6% +0.27 95–94 (50%) 147–125 (54%) 100.7 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.