H2H data updated: 2026-07-26 01:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Michael Llodra H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Llodra in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2008 Beijing Olympics third round 6-4 3-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 46
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2008* | Beijing Olympics | Olympics | R32 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Michael Llodra | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,929 | 223 | 216 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Michael Llodra | #631 | #21 | 1,575 | 1,902 | 183 | 216 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Michael Llodra | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #159 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #89 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,761 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #104 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #173 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 40–28 | 58.8% | #19 | 1,895 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 20–12 | 62.5% | #41 | 1,732 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #96 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #93 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #40 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #23 | 1,881 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,776 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #53 | 1,844 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #105 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |