H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Michael Russell H2H: 1-2
Michael Russell holds a 2–1 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Michael Russell leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2011 Houston third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2011* | Houston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-2 6-3 | Michael Russell | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2010* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Michael Russell | 6-1 7-5 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Mar 14, 2010* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Michael Russell | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,810 | 77 | 149 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Michael Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |