H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Paradorn Srichaphan H2H: 0-2
Paradorn Srichaphan holds a 2–0 lead over Igor Andreev in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paradorn Srichaphan leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 2005 Rotterdam third round 7-6(4) 1-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paradorn Srichaphan | 7-6(4) 1-6 7-5 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2004* | Chennai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Paradorn Srichaphan | 6-3 7-6(2) | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Paradorn Srichaphan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |