H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Peter Polansky H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Peter Polansky in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2009 Australian Open first round 5-7 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 5-7 3-6 6-4 6-3 6-4 | Peter Polansky | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Peter Polansky | #1,475 | #110 | 495 | 1,676 | 11 | 39 | 22.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Peter Polansky | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #821 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #343 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #185 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #186 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #135 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #119 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |