H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 1-1
Igor Andreev and Radek Stepanek are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2008 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2008* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 7-6(3) | Radek Stepanek | Match data |
| Jan 14, 2005* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-2 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |