H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Raemon Sluiter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2006 Australian Open second round 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 3-6 6-3 7-6(4) 2-6 6-2 | Raemon Sluiter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Raemon Sluiter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |