H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Robin Soderling H2H: 2-1
Igor Andreev holds a 2–1 lead over Robin Soderling in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Robin Soderling leads 1–0 on clay, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Robin Soderling won the 2008 Hamburg Masters second round 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 41
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2008* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Robin Soderling | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2006* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Igor Andreev | 3-6 7-6(14) 6-4 | Robin Soderling | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Igor Andreev | 6-7(3) 7-5 6-1 7-5 | Robin Soderling | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Robin Soderling | #195 | #4 | 6,055 | 2,172 | 285 | 166 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Robin Soderling | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #444 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #163 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #34 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,737 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,823 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #41 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #17 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #8 | 2,070 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 53–22 | 70.7% | #5 | 2,118 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 34–9 | 79.1% | #13 | 2,127 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |