H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Rui Machado H2H: 1-0
Igor Andreev holds a 1–0 lead over Rui Machado in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2010 Costa Do Sauipe fourth round 6-3 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POR
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2013 | Estoril | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Rui Machado | 7-6(2) 6-1 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
| Feb 12, 2010* | Costa Do Sauipe | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Igor Andreev | 6-3 5-7 6-4 | Rui Machado | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Rui Machado | #1,650 | #59 | 772 | 1,646 | 13 | 37 | 26.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Rui Machado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #93 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #68 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–13 | 7.1% | #307 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #299 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #320 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |