H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Igor Andreev vs Teymuraz Gabashvili H2H: 1-1
Igor Andreev and Teymuraz Gabashvili are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Teymuraz Gabashvili leads 1–0 on clay, while Igor Andreev leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Igor Andreev won the 2011 Wimbledon first round 6-4 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 43
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Igor Andreev | 6-4 7-6(5) 6-7(4) 4-6 6-3 | Teymuraz Gabashvili | Match data |
| Apr 26, 2006* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Teymuraz Gabashvili | 4-6 7-6(6) 7-6 | Igor Andreev | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Andreev | #1,011 | #18 | 2,490 | 1,913 | 219 | 214 | 50.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Teymuraz Gabashvili | #1,373 | #43 | 1,226 | 1,836 | 109 | 194 | 36.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Andreev | Teymuraz Gabashvili | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2003 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #50 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2006 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,760 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 10–28 | 26.3% | #125 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #33 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2008 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2009 | 27–30 | 47.4% | #35 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #80 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2010 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #79 | 1,700 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #138 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2011 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #182 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2012 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1015 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #67 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #50 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #138 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |