H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Igor Kunitsyn vs Lars Burgsmuller H2H: 1-0
Igor Kunitsyn holds a 1–0 lead over Lars Burgsmuller in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Igor Kunitsyn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Igor Kunitsyn won the 2006 Indianapolis third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 50
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Igor Kunitsyn | 7-5 6-2 | Lars Burgsmuller | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Kunitsyn | #1,093 | #35 | 1,562 | 1,755 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lars Burgsmuller | #1,129 | #65 | 596 | 1,747 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Kunitsyn | Lars Burgsmuller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #145 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #134 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #134 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #178 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #83 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #47 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #76 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 16–30 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #76 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #100 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #100 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 6–21 | 22.2% | #141 | 1,462 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #162 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #177 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #426 | 1,426 | 0 | 1 |