H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Igor Kunitsyn vs Paul Capdeville H2H: 0-1
Paul Capdeville holds a 1–0 lead over Igor Kunitsyn in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Capdeville leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Capdeville won the 2012 Los Angeles third round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 44
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 43
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2012* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paul Capdeville | 6-4 7-6(5) | Igor Kunitsyn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Igor Kunitsyn | #1,093 | #35 | 1,562 | 1,755 | 87 | 149 | 36.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Capdeville | #1,186 | #76 | 960 | 1,730 | 36 | 67 | 35.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Igor Kunitsyn | Paul Capdeville | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #455 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2003 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2004 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2005 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #149 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #111 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2008 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #47 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #129 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 16–30 | 34.8% | #104 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #100 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #71 | 1,720 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #166 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #162 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |