H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Igor Sijsling vs Yannick Mertens

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Igor Sijsling vs Yannick Mertens.

NED Age 39 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
BEL Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Igor Sijsling #118 6-3 6-2 7-6(2) Yannick Mertens #220 Match data Jun 28, 2016* Q3 Q Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Igor Sijsling #854 #52 910 1,828 47 86 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Yannick Mertens #1,230 #179 286 1,581 1 2 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Igor Sijsling Yannick Mertens
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 0–1 0.0% #302 1,491 0 0
20 2008 0–1 0.0% #525 1,464 0 0
22 2010 3–3 50.0% #126 1,579 0 0
23 2011 2–3 40.0% #200 1,610 0 0 2010 1–1 50.0% #247 1,499 0 0
24 2012 8–10 44.4% #68 1,758 0 0
25 2013 18–25 41.9% #70 1,747 0 0 2012 0–1 0.0% #196 1,570 0 0
26 2014 9–26 25.7% #84 1,627 0 0
27 2015 3–10 23.1% #145 1,691 0 0
28 2016 4–7 36.4% #177 1,678 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Igor Sijsling Yannick Mertens
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2008 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2010 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2011 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2012 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2013 8 18 26 30.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2012 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2014 6 13 19 31.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
Career 27 51 78 34.6% 10 22 32 31.2% 10 13 23 43.5% 1 2 3 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Igor Sijsling Yannick Mertens
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2006 1/1 8.0 6.0 50.0% 69.8% 47.2% 60.0% 9.1% 58.5% 33.6% —/—
20 2008 1/1 2.0 2.0 47.7% 61.9% 34.8% 0.0% 47.7% 22.0% —/—
22 2010 6/6 6.7 1.8 64.3% 72.7% 52.7% 65.6% 32.4% 65.7% 31.9% —/—
23 2011 5/5 9.0 3.2 58.8% 83.0% 49.4% 65.4% 29.0% 69.5% 32.0% 2010 2/2 4.0 2.5 59.6% 73.6% 52.8% 55.7% 61.7% 65.3% 42.2%
24 2012 18/18 8.3 2.1 60.5% 74.9% 49.8% 55.4% 48.8% 64.9% 33.0% —/—
25 2013 43/43 8.9 2.0 57.7% 74.9% 50.5% 57.4% 41.7% 64.6% 34.1% 2012 1/1 1.0 2.0 68.4% 66.7% 61.1% 71.4% 0.0% 64.9% 31.4%
26 2014 35/35 6.3 2.6 59.0% 73.0% 48.5% 55.6% 43.1% 62.7% 35.3% —/—
27 2015 13/13 5.5 3.8 58.4% 68.3% 46.1% 53.3% 36.5% 58.8% 32.1% —/—
28 2016 11/11 3.2 2.7 57.2% 70.5% 49.2% 45.5% 38.4% 61.2% 40.0% —/—
Career 133/133 7.2 2.5 58.7% 73.5% 49.3% 55.6% 40.8% 63.3% 34.3% 3/3 3.0 2.3 62.5% 71.3% 55.6% 61.0% 41.1% 65.1% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Igor Sijsling Yannick Mertens
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1492 100.5 -3.93 +0.57 0.811 46.0% 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 -0.11
19 2007 1482 100.7
20 2008 1465 96.9 -3.86 +0.01 0.420 35.3% 0.0% -4.00 +0.13
21 2009 1481 106.3 2008 1487 98.3
22 2010 1580 114.9 +0.67 -1.49 0.929 48.9% +42 46.7% -0.40 2–1 (67%) 2–3 (40%) +0.24 2009 1491 100.4
23 2011 1611 110.3 +1.30 -1.14 1.050 50.2% -5 41.7% -0.42 0–1 +0.26 2010 1499 101.6 -0.96 -2.72 1.214 52.6% 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 +0.49
24 2012 1759 131.7 +1.29 -1.52 0.940 49.3% -7 -128 48.8% -0.26 0–3 (0%) 6–2 (75%) -0.37 2011 1488 105.0
25 2013 1747 140.6 +0.68 -2.09 0.962 49.4% -44 -118 -16 49.0% -0.16 4–11 (27%) 9–10 (47%) -0.21 2012 1571 112.9 -1.68 +0.09 0.896 46.5% 0.0% -2.50 0.00
26 2014 1628 137.5 -0.86 -1.13 0.947 48.9% +1 -3 +39 31.8% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–15 (17%) +0.31 2013 1541 93.2
27 2015 1692 131.6 -2.85 -2.47 0.780 46.1% -59 30.6% -0.97 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) +0.23 2014 1500 96.3
28 2016 1679 124.4 -2.48 +1.67 1.030 50.4% +15 +65 40.7% -0.22 0–2 1–4 (20%) +0.90 2015 1499 97.0
29 2017 1634 95.6 2016 1518 103.3
30 2017 1510 106.5
31 2018 1476 103.3
32 2019 1461 94.4
35 2022 1447 98.3
Career 1828 134.7 -0.30 -1.39 0.935 48.9% -22 -31 -18 40.9% -0.44 12–33 (27%) 24–37 (39%) 90.2 +1.04 1581 104.7 -1.20 -1.78 1.107 50.6% 42.9% -0.29 0–1 1–0 +16.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.