H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Ion Tiriac vs Jim Mcmanus H2H: 3-1
Ion Tiriac holds a 3–1 lead over Jim Mcmanus in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Ion Tiriac leads 3–0 on clay, while Jim Mcmanus leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ion Tiriac won the 1973 Indianapolis second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ROU
Age 87
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1973 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-2 6-2 | Jim Mcmanus | Match data |
| Feb 17, 1971* | New York | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Mcmanus | 2-6 6-3 6-0 | Ion Tiriac | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 6-0 | Jim Mcmanus | Match data |
| Jul 30, 1970* | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Ion Tiriac | 6-4 6-0 | Jim Mcmanus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ion Tiriac | #439 | #55 | 0 | 1,899 | 228 | 190 | 54.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Jim Mcmanus | #418 | #90 | 0 | 1,730 | 132 | 222 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Ion Tiriac | Jim Mcmanus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1968 | 60–12 | 83.3% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1970 | 29–34 | 46.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1969 | 14–14 | 50.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 14–27 | 34.1% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1970 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 14–26 | 35.0% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1971 | 27–16 | 62.8% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 16–32 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1972 | 21–25 | 45.7% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 8 | 1974 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #132 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 1973 | 35–35 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,683 | 0 | 8 | 1975 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #152 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 1974 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,622 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 1–17 | 5.6% | #192 | 1,391 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 1975 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #138 | 1,589 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #332 | 1,371 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | 1976 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #248 | 1,534 | 0 | 8 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #418 | 1,348 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | 1977 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #103 | 1,633 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1978 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #263 | 1,523 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1979 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #439 | 1,525 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |