H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Irakli Labadze vs Martin Damm Sr H2H: 0-1

Martin Damm Sr holds a 1–0 lead over Irakli Labadze in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Damm Sr leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 2001 Newport round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Irakli Labadze
GEO Age 45 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Martin Damm Sr
CZE

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Damm Sr 6-3 6-2 Irakli Labadze #131 Match data Jul 12, 2001* R32 Newport ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Irakli Labadze #656 #42 805 1,674 41 79 34.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Martin Damm Sr — — — 1,731 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Irakli Labadze Martin Damm Sr
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1999 0–2 0.0% #302 1,477 0 0 — — — — — — —
2001 4–7 36.4% #109 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
2002 10–20 33.3% #93 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
2003 6–17 26.1% #72 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
2004 13–21 38.2% #78 1,531 0 0 — — — — — — —
2005 5–11 31.2% #140 1,535 0 0 — — — — — — —
2006 3–1 75.0% #164 1,672 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Irakli Labadze Martin Damm Sr
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
2001 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
2002 2 8 10 20.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1991 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
2003 3 6 9 33.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
2004 5 10 15 33.3% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 7 11 18 38.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
2005 3 7 10 30.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1994 7 12 19 36.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
2006 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1995 7 13 20 35.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 15 13 28 53.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 13 10 23 56.5%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 10 13 23 43.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 15 35 50 30.0% 20 32 52 38.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 3 4 25.0% Career 74 107 181 40.9% 6 28 34 17.6% 22 24 46 47.8% 51 49 100 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Irakli Labadze Martin Damm Sr
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1999 1478 104.2 -0.50 -3.29 0.908 47.7% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–2 — +0.04 1989 1492 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.08
2000 1462 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1478 98.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.15
2001 1486 112.8 +0.81 -0.59 0.960 49.9% +10 +32 — 42.9% -0.11 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 99.9 +0.09 1991 1504 104.7 — — — — +57 — — 57.1% +0.57 1–0 0–1 — +0.21
2002 1537 123.0 -1.79 -0.95 0.886 47.9% -56 +50 -24 37.7% -0.94 2–4 (33%) 6–6 (50%) 100.1 -0.79 1992 1546 125.4 — — — — +65 -88 — 35.1% -0.91 4–1 (80%) 2–5 (29%) 103.3 +0.26
2003 1481 106.4 -4.93 -3.05 0.722 43.7% +27 +19 — 30.8% -1.79 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.3 +0.12 1993 1647 128.4 — — — — +28 -196 — 44.8% -0.40 6–6 (50%) 8–5 (62%) 105.4 +0.61
2004 1532 127.7 -2.03 -0.81 0.872 47.5% -16 +28 -42 42.5% -0.65 6–6 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 102.7 +0.08 1994 1630 133.5 — — — — -23 -172 +21 44.4% -0.32 3–13 (19%) 9–10 (47%) 92.4 -0.61
2005 1535 121.2 -3.53 -0.42 0.822 47.1% -21 +13 — 35.9% -0.90 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.01 1995 1619 133.0 — — — — +8 — — 42.3% -0.55 9–8 (53%) 11–11 (50%) 102.9 -0.27
2006 1673 103.6 +3.59 +1.64 1.263 54.2% — — +10 54.5% +0.73 1–0 0–1 — -0.04 1996 1709 139.5 — — — — +35 — -23 47.9% -0.08 13–8 (62%) 13–18 (42%) 102.9 +1.26
2008 1640 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1694 135.4 — — — — +35 -281 +7 48.3% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 16–10 (62%) 105.2 +0.62
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1649 132.2 — — — — +16 — +23 42.9% -0.50 7–7 (50%) 8–11 (42%) 98.6 -0.31
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1578 123.5 — — — — +27 -177 +52 39.1% -0.78 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 90.9 -0.57
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1615 127.5 — — — — -72 -159 +102 44.2% -0.34 7–3 (70%) 6–9 (40%) 105.2 +0.30
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1514 96.3 — — — — — — +91 15.0% -1.90 — 0–2 — +0.77
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1525 111.4 — — — — +15 — — 37.5% -0.75 — 1–1 — -0.13
Career 1674 121.7 -2.37 -1.19 0.849 47.2% -13 +32 -17 38.6% -0.87 16–23 (41%) 17–20 (46%) 101.4 -0.43 Career 1732 136.6 — — — — +17 -170 +36 43.3% -0.43 59–60 (50%) 77–88 (47%) 101.6 +0.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.