H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Istvan Gulyas vs Cliff Richey H2H: 1-1
Istvan Gulyas and Cliff Richey are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Istvan Gulyas leads 1–0 on clay, while Cliff Richey leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Istvan Gulyas won the 1971 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 7-5 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
HUN
Age 94
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 79
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1971* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Istvan Gulyas | 6-4 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Cliff Richey | Match data |
| Jun 24, 1970* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Cliff Richey | 6-2 6-8 6-4 6-4 | Istvan Gulyas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Istvan Gulyas | #890 | #128 | 0 | 1,803 | 58 | 57 | 50.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Cliff Richey | #662 | #16 | 0 | 2,112 | 488 | 224 | 68.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 23 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Istvan Gulyas | Cliff Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 46–15 | 75.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 64–18 | 78.0% | — | 1,946 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 88–24 | 78.6% | — | 2,047 | 0 | 14 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 67–23 | 74.4% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 54–24 | 69.2% | — | 1,956 | 0 | 20 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #19 | 1,848 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #23 | 1,891 | 0 | 21 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #32 | 1,855 | 0 | 21 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,848 | 0 | 22 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #97 | 1,714 | 0 | 22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #57 | 1,705 | 0 | 23 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,693 | 0 | 23 |
| 36 | 1968 | 24–16 | 60.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1969 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,624 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1970 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1971 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 1972 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 1973 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #222 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |